Tag:Spoliation

1
Neely v. The Boeing Company (Western Disctrict of Washington, 2019)
2
Drive Time Car Sales Company, LLC v. Pettigrew (Southern District of Ohio, 2019)
3
Resnik et al v. Coulson (District Court of Eastern District of New York, 2019)
4
Wakefield v. Visalus, Inc. (District Court of Oregon, 2019)
5
Palomo v. DeMaio et al (District Court of Northern District of New York, 2019)
6
Envy Hawaii, LLC v. Volvo Car USA LLC, No. 17-00040 HG-RT (D. Haw. Mar. 20, 2019)
7
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Kormanis (Middle District of North Carolina, 2019)
8
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Performance Food Grp., No CCB-13-1712 (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2019)
9
Rubury v. Ford Motor Co. (New Jersey, 2019)
10
DR Distrib., LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (N.D. Ill., 2019)

Neely v. The Boeing Company (Western Disctrict of Washington, 2019)

Key Insight: Bifurcation of a pst file does not constitute destruction/spoliation

Nature of Case: Employment age discrimation

Electronic Data Involved: .pst file

Keywords: pst file, “whole, untouched, pristine condition”

View Case Opinion

Drive Time Car Sales Company, LLC v. Pettigrew (Southern District of Ohio, 2019)

Key Insight: Without intent, adverse inference cannot be granted in spoliation of evidence but lesser sanctions still can

Nature of Case: Wrongful termination,

Electronic Data Involved: Text messages

Keywords: duty to preserve, auction, preowned vehicles

View Case Opinion

Resnik et al v. Coulson (District Court of Eastern District of New York, 2019)

Key Insight: Whether downloading spyware is sufficient circumstantial evidence could result sanction under rule 37(e)(2)

Nature of Case: computer fraud

Electronic Data Involved: deleted electronic records

Keywords: spyware, digital fingerprints

View Case Opinion

Wakefield v. Visalus, Inc. (District Court of Oregon, 2019)

Key Insight: whether to wait eve of trial could undertake the necessary fact finding to resolve issues that the plaintiff raises

Nature of Case: Violation of TCPA

Electronic Data Involved: call records

Keywords: spreadsheet, dialing system

View Case Opinion

Palomo v. DeMaio et al (District Court of Northern District of New York, 2019)

Key Insight: whether plaintiff has a duty preserve audio recordings prior to counter claims

Nature of Case: breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: Audio recordings

Keywords: trespass to chattels, conspiracies, replevin

View Case Opinion

Envy Hawaii, LLC v. Volvo Car USA LLC, No. 17-00040 HG-RT (D. Haw. Mar. 20, 2019)

Key Insight: failure to preserve electronically stored information. Claim that no spoliation occurred because records are available from 3rd parties. Under 37(e), information is lost only if it is irretrievable from another source.

Nature of Case: Improper business practices

Electronic Data Involved: google email accounts and electronic dealer management system records

Keywords: failure to preserve. “it cannot be restored or replaced through additional discovery.” FRCP 37(e)

View Case Opinion

Nuvasive, Inc. v. Kormanis (Middle District of North Carolina, 2019)

Key Insight: Lack of action taken is not a reasonable step to maintain evidence and can lead to spoliation sanctions

Nature of Case: Employment/breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: Email, text messages

Keywords: 30 day deletion, InoSpine

View Case Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Performance Food Grp., No CCB-13-1712 (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2019)

Key Insight: ESI protocol agreed to by parties precluded EEOC from arguing other tapes were spoiled since Defendant complied with protocol.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: E-mails and Documents regarding employee hotline

Keywords: Spoilation; Agreements between Parties

View Case Opinion

Rubury v. Ford Motor Co. (New Jersey, 2019)

Key Insight: Counsel has no duty to inform opposing counsel to preserve evidence that would be beneficial to opposing counsel’s claims

Nature of Case: Product liability

Electronic Data Involved: Airbag data (RCM)

Keywords: Ford, airbag, dismissed, spoliation

Identified State Rule(s): Rule 4:6-2(e)

View Case Opinion

DR Distrib., LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (N.D. Ill., 2019)

Key Insight: Plaintiffs object to dismissal of a counterclaim against them because Defendant’s desire to dismiss the claim is related to loss of relevant ESI

Nature of Case: defamation, trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail, instant messages

Keywords: counterclaim, motion to amend, diligent, dismissal

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.