Tag:Spoliation

1
Rockman Company v. Nong Shim Company (Northern District California, 2017)
2
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cuker Interactive, LLC (W.D. Ark., 2017)
3
Van Buren v. Crawford County (Eastern District of Michigan, 2017)
4
Edelson v. Cheung (D. N.J., 2017)
5
Ruehl v. S.N.M. (Middle District Pennsylvania, 2017)
6
United States v. Volkswagen AG (E.D. Mich., 2017)
7
Jackson v. Haynes & Haynes (N.D. Ala., 2017)
8
Simon v. City of New York, 2017 WL 57860, No. 14-cv-8391-JMF (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2017)
9
Helget v. City of Hays (10th Cir., 2017)
10
Cahill v. Dart (N.D. Ill., 2016)

Rockman Company v. Nong Shim Company (Northern District California, 2017)

Key Insight: Duty of preservation is not enforceable for foreign company investigated by foreign government with no lawsuits filed in USA

Nature of Case: antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: deleted electronic records

Keywords: duty of preservation foreign, foreign government investigation preserve

View Case Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cuker Interactive, LLC (W.D. Ark., 2017)

Key Insight: failure to review backup tapes, attorney’s fees

Nature of Case: contract dispute

Electronic Data Involved: email, backup tapes

Keywords: destruction of laptop, key employee, prejudice, duty to preserve, adverse inference, retention policy

View Case Opinion

Van Buren v. Crawford County (Eastern District of Michigan, 2017)

Key Insight: FRCP 37(e) not used, discretionary powers used instead. Litigation after a police shooting should be anticipated. Failures all around with the destruction of evidence lead to an adverse inference.

Nature of Case: Wrongful death (excessive police force)

Electronic Data Involved: Audio recordings

Keywords: excessive force, marijuana, knife, child protective services, metadata, shell game

View Case Opinion

Edelson v. Cheung (D. N.J., 2017)

Key Insight: Although the deletion was intentional, the plaintiff was not unduly prejudiced, as there is sufficient other evidence. Therefore, not sanctions other than attorney’s fees for the motion.

Nature of Case: Contract

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: Spoliation sanction, prejudice, intentional

View Case Opinion

Ruehl v. S.N.M. (Middle District Pennsylvania, 2017)

Key Insight: No spoliation because employees were merely unaware/untrained on surveillance system and didn’t intentionally withhold evidence

Nature of Case: wrongful death, slip and fall

Electronic Data Involved: video surveillance

Keywords: Rule 37 ignored, no culpable state of mind, unaware of surveillance

View Case Opinion

United States v. Volkswagen AG (E.D. Mich., 2017)

Key Insight: Spoliation

Nature of Case: Plea Agreement – Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, Entry of Goods by False Statement

Electronic Data Involved: USB drives, hard drives

Keywords: instruction to destroy documents, late notice of DOJ litigation hold, failure to preserve backup disks, instruction to store documents on removable media rather than network drives

Jackson v. Haynes & Haynes (N.D. Ala., 2017)

Key Insight: being negligent and irresponsible in maintaining information and knowing of the obligation to preserve the integrity of the information are not sufficient to show an intent to deprive

Nature of Case: improper termination

Electronic Data Involved: ESI concerning arrival and departure times

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions, intent to deprive, obligation to preserve, adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Helget v. City of Hays (10th Cir., 2017)

Key Insight: Measures to cure prejudice should be no greater than necessary, but if a party acts with intent to deprive, the court may presume unfavorability, issue an adverse inference, or dismiss and enter a default. You must raise your spoliation motions before summary judgment is ruled on.

Nature of Case: Unlawful termination

Electronic Data Involved: relevant electronic communications and documents

Keywords: prejudice, spoliation, intent to deprive, adverse influence

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.