Tag:Spoliation

1
United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., No. 2: 11-cv-05097-FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2017)
2
US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)
3
Garcia v. City of Santa Clara (Northern District of California, 2017)
4
Tchatat v. OHara (Southern District of NY, 2017)
5
Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)
6
Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank (E.D. Cal., 2017)
7
Hsueh v. New York State Dep?t of Fin. Servs (Southern District of New York, 2017)
8
Hsueh v. New York State, No. 15 cv 3401 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2017)
9
Inderjeet Basra v. Ecklund Logistics (D.Neb, 2017)
10
Agility Public Whsg. v. DOD (D. D.C., 2017)

United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., No. 2: 11-cv-05097-FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2017)

Key Insight: Failure to issue a litigation hold, misrepresentation that a hold had been issued, spoliation of evidence, attorney fee award.

Nature of Case: water-protection law violation

Electronic Data Involved: Not specified. However, likely, email and other electronic records.

Keywords: spoliation, litigation hold, lodestar calculation, special master.

View Case Opinion

US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)

Key Insight: Whether FRCP 37(e) applies where the duty to preserve does not arise out of the anticipation or conduct of litigation, whether sanctions issued under a court’s inherent power were appropriate

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: country of origin data

Keywords: Country of Origin documentation, adverse inference, Trade Agreements Act, inherent power, overwrite, direct proof or disproof

View Case Opinion

Garcia v. City of Santa Clara (Northern District of California, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanction and adverse inference inappropriate because nothing lost/destroyed was highly probative

Nature of Case: Excessive force

Electronic Data Involved: emails, reports

Keywords: adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Tchatat v. OHara (Southern District of NY, 2017)

Key Insight: Arrest did not trigger a duty for defendants to preserve video of alleged beating before arrest

Nature of Case: Wrongful arrest

Electronic Data Involved: video, electronic photos

Keywords: triggering duty to preserve

View Case Opinion

Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)

Key Insight: Can the court order additional discovery if a party destroys evidence? Is a prejudice ruling required in a destruction of evidence case?

Nature of Case: Retaliation and discharge

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, emails, social media messages

Keywords: Prejudice, Destruction of evidence, Social media, Text messages

View Case Opinion

Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank (E.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: Conduct discovery in good faith; Maintain a civil tone in communications; Purge of emails

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: ESI; email; SMS; Text messages

Keywords: Good Faith; Proportionality; Meet and confer; Rule 16 – Scope of discovery; Purge of emails; Complete breakdown of discovery

View Case Opinion

Hsueh v. New York State Dep?t of Fin. Servs (Southern District of New York, 2017)

Key Insight: Intentionally deleting ESI is different from failing to preserve and falls under a court’s inherent authority, not FRCP 37(e).

Nature of Case: Sexual harassment

Electronic Data Involved: Recorded conversation

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions, recording, DFS, department of financial services

View Case Opinion

Hsueh v. New York State, No. 15 cv 3401 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2017)

Key Insight: Court said 37(e) doesn’t apply when recording was intentionally deleted. Adverse inference granted for plaintiff’s deletion of an audio tape, despite its subsequent recovery and production from a hard drive backup.

Nature of Case: sexual harassment at work

Electronic Data Involved: audio tape, hard drive backup

Keywords: adverse inference, over-preservation concerns

Inderjeet Basra v. Ecklund Logistics (D.Neb, 2017)

Key Insight: no intentional destruction of evidence, mere negligence in not maintaining record of accidents in Qualcomm/PeopleNet

Nature of Case: negligence, loss of consortium, punitive damages

Electronic Data Involved: Qualcomm data, PeopleNet server data

Keywords: Spoliation

View Case Opinion

Agility Public Whsg. v. DOD (D. D.C., 2017)

Key Insight: 37(e) takes precedence over inherent authority in cases where it can be applied. Spoliation took place before there was anticipation of a trial.

Nature of Case: Defamation, tortious interference with contracts

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails

Keywords: Spoliation, inherent authority, 37(e)

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.