Tag:Proportionality

1
Swift Beef Co. v. Alex Lee, Inc., No. 18-0105-EFM-KGG (D. Kan. Oct. 31, 2018)
2
Henson v. Turn (Northern District of California, 2018)
3
Beseke v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, No. 17-CV-4971-DWF-KMM (D. Minn, 2018)
4
Updateme Inc. v. Axel Springer SE, No. 17-cv-05054-SI (LB) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2018)
5
Corel Software v. Microsoft (District of Utah, 2018)
6
Garrett v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees, No. 17-cv-2874-T-23AAS (M.D. Fla. Sept. 14, 2018)
7
Price v. Synapse Grp. Inc. (Southern District California, 2018)
8
Vallejo v. Amgen, Inc (8th Circuit Appellate Court, 2018)
9
HouseCanary, Inc. v. Quicken Loans No. SA-18-CV-0519-FB (W.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2018)
10
City of Rockford, et al. v. Mallinckrodt ARD Inc., et al. (Northern District of Illinois, 2018)

Swift Beef Co. v. Alex Lee, Inc., No. 18-0105-EFM-KGG (D. Kan. Oct. 31, 2018)

Key Insight: relevance, proportionality, undue burden, relative access

Nature of Case: contract dispute

Electronic Data Involved: sweeping document request

Keywords: motion to quash, defunct entity, third party subpoena

View Case Opinion

Henson v. Turn (Northern District of California, 2018)

Key Insight: Direct inspection of mobile devices for specific information (browsing history/cookies) or the full web browsing history/cookies is not proportional to matters regarding a single company’s websites

Nature of Case: Data privacy

Electronic Data Involved: Cookies, internet history

Keywords: zombie cookie, Verizon, respawn, orwellian irony

View Case Opinion

Beseke v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, No. 17-CV-4971-DWF-KMM (D. Minn, 2018)

Key Insight: accessibility of data

Nature of Case: Violations of the FCRA

Electronic Data Involved: information related to similar lawsuits and consumer complaints

Keywords: data, searchable, accessible, access*, undue burden,

View Case Opinion

Updateme Inc. v. Axel Springer SE, No. 17-cv-05054-SI (LB) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2018)

Key Insight: proportionality, undue burden, ESI protocol terms, privilege

Nature of Case: trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: electronic records

Keywords: random sample, random sampling, responsiveness, responsive documents

View Case Opinion

Corel Software v. Microsoft (District of Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: Available resources plays into undue burden decision making and when part of the data has already been produced, relevance has already been conceded

Nature of Case: Infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Telemetry data

Keywords: Telemetry data, GPDR

View Case Opinion

Garrett v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees, No. 17-cv-2874-T-23AAS (M.D. Fla. Sept. 14, 2018)

Key Insight: cost-shifting, proportionality

Nature of Case: Title IX violation

Electronic Data Involved: computer, cell phone, text messages

Keywords: privacy interests, forensic examination, attorney’s fees and costs, inconsistent testimony

View Case Opinion

Price v. Synapse Grp. Inc. (Southern District California, 2018)

Key Insight: A part protesting specific RFPs in an ESI stipulation must show why it is unduly burdensome

Nature of Case: class action unfair competition

Electronic Data Involved: audio files, hard-copy correspondence, archived email

Keywords: pre class certification discovery, ESI protocol, ESI Stipulation, proportionality

View Case Opinion

Vallejo v. Amgen, Inc (8th Circuit Appellate Court, 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff was sanctioned for re-litigating issues, ignoring court orders and insisting on overbroad scope of discovery

Nature of Case: products liability

Electronic Data Involved: Documents generally

Keywords: sanctions, scope of discovery, disregarding court orders

View Case Opinion

HouseCanary, Inc. v. Quicken Loans No. SA-18-CV-0519-FB (W.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2018)

Key Insight: Discovery gamesmanship. The Court expects full and open discovery.

Nature of Case: trade secrets dispute

Electronic Data Involved: discovery in general

Keywords: Kumbaya, acerbic shrillness, truth is like the sun, Rambo tactics

View Case Opinion

City of Rockford, et al. v. Mallinckrodt ARD Inc., et al. (Northern District of Illinois, 2018)

Key Insight: Sampling the null set is appropriate and proportional

Nature of Case: Antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: Electronically stored documents generally

Keywords: prescription medication, Acthar, clowns, TAR,

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.