Tag:Privilege or Work Product Protections

1
Ronnie Van Zant v. Artimus Pyle (S.D.N.Y., 2017)
2
CFPB v. Universal Debt Solutions, LLC, et al. (District Court of Georgia, 2017)
3
Hallmark Insurance Company v. Maxum Casualty Insurance Company, 6:16-cv-2063-Orl-37GJK (Florida, Middle District, 2017)
4
Irth Sols. LLC v. Windstream Communications LLC (S. D. Ohio, 2017)
5
Miller v. Zara USA, 2017 NY Slip Op 04407 [151 AD3d 462] (N.Y. App. June 6, 2017)
6
Iris Mediaworks, Ltd. v. Vasisht (Sup. Ct. N.Y., 2017)
7
Engurasoff v. Coca-Cola Refreshments (Northern District of California, 2017)
8
Baxter International, Inc. v. AXA Versicherung, 1:11-cv-09131 (N.D. Ill.) (Illionis Northern District, 2017)
9
Walker v. Geico Indemnity Company, 6:15-cv-1002-Orl-41KRS (M.D. Fla, 2017)
10
Lombardo v. Government Emps. Ins. Co., No. 3:16cv392/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 23, 2017).

Ronnie Van Zant v. Artimus Pyle (S.D.N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: failure to have a third party preserve relevant data

Nature of Case: request for a permanent injunction to block film distribution

Electronic Data Involved: text messages

Keywords: third party, spoliation, control, adverse inference, sanctions, practical ability, intent to deprive, subpoena

View Case Opinion

CFPB v. Universal Debt Solutions, LLC, et al. (District Court of Georgia, 2017)

Key Insight: violation of repeated discovery orders warrants the substantial sanction of dismissing the counts.

Nature of Case: Massive debt-collection scheme

Keywords: payment processor, debt collector, collector, robo-call.

View Case Opinion

Hallmark Insurance Company v. Maxum Casualty Insurance Company, 6:16-cv-2063-Orl-37GJK (Florida, Middle District, 2017)

Key Insight: work product protection does not apply to investigation or handling of underlying claim in a bad faith case.

Nature of Case: bad faith insurance claim

Electronic Data Involved: Insurance claim file including work product and possibly privileged documents

Keywords: work product, underlying claim, investigation, bad faith, privilege log

View Case Opinion

Irth Sols. LLC v. Windstream Communications LLC (S. D. Ohio, 2017)

Key Insight: Whether FRE 502 applies, whether production was inadvertent, interplay between FRE 502 and clawback agreement, whether production was completely reckless, specificity requirements of clawback agreement

Nature of Case: breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: e-mail

Keywords: reckless, clawback agreement, waiver, privilege, inadvertent production, court order, log

View Case Opinion

Miller v. Zara USA, 2017 NY Slip Op 04407 [151 AD3d 462] (N.Y. App. June 6, 2017)

Key Insight: Attorney client privilege and work product protections for communications from company devices

Nature of Case: employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Company laptop data

Keywords: attorney client privilege, computer forensics, privacy policy, work product

Identified State Rule(s): CPLR 3103

Engurasoff v. Coca-Cola Refreshments (Northern District of California, 2017)

Key Insight: Disclosing legal advice to third parties that need to know via email maintains attorney client privilege

Nature of Case: class action

Electronic Data Involved: archived email

Keywords: timeliness, third parties need to know, attorney client privilege

Identified State Rule(s): Ca. Evidence Code 952

View Case Opinion

Baxter International, Inc. v. AXA Versicherung, 1:11-cv-09131 (N.D. Ill.) (Illionis Northern District, 2017)

Key Insight: plaintiff is seeking notices of litigation sent to co-insurers by defendant and defendant claims work product and privilege.

Nature of Case: MDL against drug companies for damages for allegedly contaminated blood products.

Electronic Data Involved: post-litigation communications with co-insurers and re-insurers.

Keywords: work product, privilege, notice to insurers, scope of coverage

View Case Opinion

Walker v. Geico Indemnity Company, 6:15-cv-1002-Orl-41KRS (M.D. Fla, 2017)

Key Insight: Whether a determination of an inadvertent production of documents was erroneous or that the attorney didn’t follow reasonable steps to prevent disclosure.

Nature of Case: Personal Injury, insurance bad faith

Electronic Data Involved: Inadvertently produced documents, produced work product/ACP

Keywords: work product, inadvertent disclosure, claw back, reasonable steps to avoid disclosure

View Case Opinion

Lombardo v. Government Emps. Ins. Co., No. 3:16cv392/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 23, 2017).

Key Insight: personnel file related to settlement and claims handling was ordered to be produced with some confidentiality and redactions to protect personal information of adjuster.

Nature of Case: bad faith

Electronic Data Involved: adjusters personnel file

Keywords: personnel file

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.