Tag:Other Federal Rule(s) of Civil Procedure and/or Evidence

1
Watkins v. New York Transit Authority, 2018 WL 895624, No. 1:2016cv04161 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2018)
2
Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)
3
Gipson v. Management & Training Corp., No. 16-CV-624, 2018 WL 736265 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 6, 2018).
4
Martinez v. City of New York (Eastern District of New York, 2018)
5
Wesley Corporation, et al., v. Zoom T.V. Products, LLC, et al., No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC-SDD (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2018)
6
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Papanek (No. 3:15-cv-240, 2018 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 5, 2018), 2018)
7
Landry v. Swire Oilfield Servs. (New Mexico District Court, 2018)
8
EEOC v. Jetstream, 878 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)
9
Johnson v. Ford Motor Co. (S.D. W. Va. , 2017)
10
Youngevity Int’l Corp. v. Smith, No. 16-cv-704-BTM-JLB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2017)

Watkins v. New York Transit Authority, 2018 WL 895624, No. 1:2016cv04161 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff traded in her cell phone, Defendant requested an adverse inference for spoliation

Nature of Case: hostile work environment and retaliation

Electronic Data Involved: text messages

Keywords: spoliation, adverse inference, text messages

View Case Opinion

Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)

Key Insight: Private messages between individuals that are not defendants are protected from discovery through the Stored Communications Act even if the providing company itself is the named defendant

Nature of Case: Class action securities fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic messages (twitter direct messages)

Keywords: Class action, direct message, twitter, stock

View Case Opinion

Gipson v. Management & Training Corp., No. 16-CV-624, 2018 WL 736265 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 6, 2018).

Key Insight: Motion (denied) for adverse inference based on alleged spoliation.

Nature of Case: 8th Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C. s. 1983

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance video

Keywords: inherent power, adverse-inference instruction

View Case Opinion

Martinez v. City of New York (Eastern District of New York, 2018)

Key Insight: Extreme misconduct by defendant leads to recommendation of termination sanctions

Nature of Case: Civil rights violations (police excessive force)

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic records generally

Keywords: retrospect, contempt, sanctions, Agiwal factors, repeated and numerous violations,

View Case Opinion

Wesley Corporation, et al., v. Zoom T.V. Products, LLC, et al., No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC-SDD (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2018)

Key Insight: Boilerplate objections to discovery requests can lead to sanctions without being specifically tailored to the request

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (patent and trademark infringement), breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data

Keywords: boilerplate, obstructionism, objections

View Case Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Papanek (No. 3:15-cv-240, 2018 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 5, 2018), 2018)

Key Insight: whether there was accessibility problems or undue burden or cost associated with turning over phones and computers for forensic imaging; also, whether it was sufficient to have plaintiff’s employee’s conduct a search for responsive ESI

Nature of Case: breach of contract, tortious interference

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, phone messages, physical computers and cellphones and their data

Keywords: “former business relationship”, “information may be discoverable even if not ultimately admissible into evidence”, “Allstate, however, agreed to produce responsive information within its custody”

View Case Opinion

Landry v. Swire Oilfield Servs. (New Mexico District Court, 2018)

Key Insight: Courts should be less involved in discovery dispute regarding ESI despite recent FRCP amendments

Nature of Case: Labor Standards Class Action

Electronic Data Involved: third party electronic payroll data

Keywords: FRCP 2015 amendments, electronically readable fomat

View Case Opinion

EEOC v. Jetstream, 878 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. Dec. 28, 2017)

Key Insight: loss or destruction of documents and spoliation sanctions

Nature of Case: refusal to hire

Electronic Data Involved: destroyed notes (not specified to be electronic), Excel spreadsheet

Keywords: adverse inference instruction, Fed. R. Evid. 301, Hicks, EEOC

View Case Opinion

Youngevity Int’l Corp. v. Smith, No. 16-cv-704-BTM-JLB (S.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2017)

Key Insight: 4.2 million pages of keyword “”hit”” documents produced without review, but designated “”Attorney Eyes Only.

Nature of Case: unfair competition

Electronic Data Involved: 4.2 million pages of keyword “”hit”” documents

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.