Tag:Motion to Compel

1
Waters v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (District Court D. Kansas, 2016)
2
Gade v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (District of Vermont, 2016)
3
Hellers Gas, Inc. v. International Ins. Co. of Hannover Ltd. (M.D. Pa., 2016)
4
Al-Ameri v. Johns Hopkins Hospital (D. Md. , 2016)
5
AVM Technologies LLC v. Intel Corp. (D. Del., 2016)
6
Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc. (District Court of Kansas, 2016)
7
Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)
8
LBBW Luxemburg S.A. v. Wells Fargo Sec. LLC (Southern District of New York, 2016)
9
Odeh v. City of Baton Rouge E. Baton Rouge (Middle District of Lousiana, 2016)
10
Dao v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Northern District of CA, 2016)

Waters v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (District Court D. Kansas, 2016)

Key Insight: Asserting well supported objection against a relevant request.

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: social media accounts, and postings

Keywords: social media records, mental state, postings

View Case Opinion

Gade v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (District of Vermont, 2016)

Key Insight: When the productions of underlying information (exact Excel formulas in this case) may disclose proprietary information, a supplemental disclosure explaining the underlying reasons may be a suitable replacement

Nature of Case: Automobile insurance coverage

Electronic Data Involved: Excel spreadsheet formulas

Keywords: Excel, formulas, moot, metadata, award of sanctions, expenses, fees

View Case Opinion

Hellers Gas, Inc. v. International Ins. Co. of Hannover Ltd. (M.D. Pa., 2016)

Key Insight: Plaintiff failure to produce relevant and discoverable information.

Nature of Case: Insurance coverage litigation.

Electronic Data Involved: Email produced by a third party.

Keywords: Motion to compel. Specificity. Failure to specify.

View Case Opinion

AVM Technologies LLC v. Intel Corp. (D. Del., 2016)

Key Insight: court allows keyword search of one database (agreed to by party) but denies search of three others deeming them disproportionate

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: database

Keywords: keyword search, disproportionate,

Digital Ally, Inc. v. Utility Associates, Inc. (District Court of Kansas, 2016)

Key Insight: whether stating that “ESI request is not relevant or proportional” is not sufficient.

Nature of Case: breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: emails

Keywords: informal internal emails

Identified State Rule(s): D. Kan. 37(2)

View Case Opinion

Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)

Key Insight: not ordered to reproduce production of documents in native format (with metadata) but only categories specifically requested by plaintiff

Nature of Case: wrongful termination – contract

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: native format

View Case Opinion

LBBW Luxemburg S.A. v. Wells Fargo Sec. LLC (Southern District of New York, 2016)

Key Insight: Non-responsive documents should not be produced, even if redacted, and privilege or some sort of reason must be asserted for redactions to be proper

Nature of Case: Fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents generally

Keywords: redactions, bloomberg, non-responsive

View Case Opinion

Odeh v. City of Baton Rouge E. Baton Rouge (Middle District of Lousiana, 2016)

Key Insight: Production of an plaintiff employee’s own entire email box of 13 years is overbroad and not proportional

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination, whistleblower protection

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents generally

Keywords: proportional, 13 years,

View Case Opinion

Dao v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Northern District of CA, 2016)

Key Insight: if the balance of the discovery requests outweighed their benefit

Nature of Case: Breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud , negligent misrepresentation, declaratory relief and unfair competition.

Electronic Data Involved: responses of three interrogatories in light of changes to rule 26

Keywords: proportionality, motion to compel, balance of request, benefit of requested discovery

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.