Tag:Motion to Compel

1
Mirmina v. Genpact LLC, No. 3:16-cv-00614-AWT (D. Conn. July 27, 2018)
2
T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)
3
Nachurs Alpine Solutions, Corp. v. Banks and Nutra-Flo Co., No. 5:15-CV-04015-LTS-CJW (N.D. Iowa July 7, 2017)
4
Tingle v. Hebert, No. 3:15-cv-00626-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. June 9, 2017)
5
Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc., No. 7:16-CV-18-D (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017).
6
Phoenix Light SF Ltd. V. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 14cv10103 (JGK)(DF) (S.D.N.Y. June 5, 2017)
7
First Am. Bankcard, Inc. v. Smart Bus. Tech., Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00638-KDE-JCW (E.D. La. May 24, 2017)
8
Abbott v. Wyoming Cty. Sheriff?s Office, No. 15-CV-531W (W.D.N.Y. May 16, 2017)
9
Westfield Ins. Co. v. Icon Legacy Custom Modular Homes, 321 F.R.D. 107 (4:15-cv-00539) (M.D. Pa. 2017).
10
Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Mirmina v. Genpact LLC, No. 3:16-cv-00614-AWT (D. Conn. July 27, 2018)

Key Insight: whether counsel assumed responsibility for ensuring a comprehensive search was conducted

Nature of Case: employment discrimination

Keywords: comprehensive search, litigation hold, guidance, reasonable inquiry

View Case Opinion

T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)

Key Insight: Keyword searching alone may not be sufficient and can be aided by strategies like predictive coding

Nature of Case: civil rights, fourth amendment

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, social media posts

Keywords: keyword searching, predictive coding

View Case Opinion

Nachurs Alpine Solutions, Corp. v. Banks and Nutra-Flo Co., No. 5:15-CV-04015-LTS-CJW (N.D. Iowa July 7, 2017)

Key Insight: Production of non-responsive documents for re-review due to distrust may be cost shifted to opposing party

Nature of Case: Trade secret

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents

Keywords: fertilizer, trade secret, Nutra-Flo,

View Case Opinion

Tingle v. Hebert, No. 3:15-cv-00626-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. June 9, 2017)

Key Insight: Discovery requests must be proportional; limited to scope/time frame

Nature of Case: Wrongful termination, defamation

Electronic Data Involved: E-mails, text messages

Keywords: Retaliation, discrimination, Louisiana Office of Alcohol and Tobacco Control

View Case Opinion

Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc., No. 7:16-CV-18-D (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017).

Key Insight: Jury Instruction due to failure to preserve electronically stored information.

Nature of Case: Defamation

Electronic Data Involved: Web browser history, Internet browser

Keywords: Web browser history, Spoliation

View Case Opinion

Phoenix Light SF Ltd. V. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 14cv10103 (JGK)(DF) (S.D.N.Y. June 5, 2017)

Key Insight: Search for ESI (specifically emails) using search terms.

Nature of Case: Trusts, Contractual and fiduciary obligations

Electronic Data Involved: Emails and attachments

Keywords: Trusts, Trust name or identifier, electronic search, search terms.

View Case Opinion

First Am. Bankcard, Inc. v. Smart Bus. Tech., Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00638-KDE-JCW (E.D. La. May 24, 2017)

Key Insight: Specific objections are required for proportionality claims

Nature of Case: Breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data

Keywords: boilerplate, control, former owner and top officers

View Case Opinion

Abbott v. Wyoming Cty. Sheriff?s Office, No. 15-CV-531W (W.D.N.Y. May 16, 2017)

Key Insight: Discovery had been completed in September 2016. In February 2017, at deposition, additional on-going claims were presented. Court specified search terms to use against 3 custodians for the additional time frame.

Nature of Case: American with Disabilities; Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail

Keywords: Search Terms, Supplemental Production; Additional Discovery

View Case Opinion

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Icon Legacy Custom Modular Homes, 321 F.R.D. 107 (4:15-cv-00539) (M.D. Pa. 2017).

Key Insight: Contract was not ambiguous so extrinsic evidence not admissable. Therefore discovery of file was not proportional or calculated to lead to admissable evidence.

Nature of Case: declaratory judgment and bad faith

Electronic Data Involved: underwriters claim file

Keywords: admissability; proportionality; extrinsic evidence

View Case Opinion

Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant has inadequate production even when supplemented. Judge ordered meet-and-confer to work out some of the disagreements. Judge did not give either side sanctions.

Nature of Case: Breach of Contract; Consumer Fraud

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail; Electronic Database

Keywords: Meet-and-confer; Inadequate Production; Supplemental Production

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.