Tag:Motion to Compel

1
Kelly Forman v. Mark Henkin (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
2
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Federal Circuit, 2018)
3
Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)
4
In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)
5
Apex Mort. Corp. v. Great N. Ins. Co., No, 17 C 3376 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2018)
6
White v. U.S., No. 4:15-cv-01252-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Jan. 9, 2018)
7
Tsanacas v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 17-CV-00306 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2018).
8
Firefighter’s Retirement System, et al, v. Citco Group Limited, et al., No. 3:13-cv-00373-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Jan. 3, 2018)
9
Landry v. Swire Oilfield Servs. (New Mexico District Court, 2018)
10
Par Pharm., Inc. v. Express Scripts Specialty Distribution Servs., Inc., No. 4:17MC510 RLW, 2018 WL 264840 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 2, 2018)

Kelly Forman v. Mark Henkin (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)

Key Insight: Privacy settings do not govern scope of disclosure of social media materials

Nature of Case: Personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: Facebook posts

Keywords: Facebook, privacy setting, horse, social media

Identified State Rule(s): CPLR 3101, CPLR 3103

View Case Opinion

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Federal Circuit, 2018)

Key Insight: if the district court erred in going forward with trial even though all samples were not produced in discovery

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: samples of proposed infringing product

Keywords: production of materials, motion to compel production, sufficient evidence

View Case Opinion

Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)

Key Insight: Private messages between individuals that are not defendants are protected from discovery through the Stored Communications Act even if the providing company itself is the named defendant

Nature of Case: Class action securities fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic messages (twitter direct messages)

Keywords: Class action, direct message, twitter, stock

View Case Opinion

In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)

Key Insight: relevance and proportionality

Nature of Case: false advertising

Electronic Data Involved: documents, communications

Keywords: relevant, proportional, reconsideration, additional discovery, custodial files, protective order, third party discovery

View Case Opinion

Apex Mort. Corp. v. Great N. Ins. Co., No, 17 C 3376 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2018)

Key Insight: Court narrowed scope of some plaintiff requests and ordered defendant to clarify privilege claims on withheld documents

Nature of Case: bad faith; insurance coverage

Electronic Data Involved: claims file of insurer

Keywords: privilege; responsiveness

View Case Opinion

Tsanacas v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 17-CV-00306 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2018).

Key Insight: Boilerplate objections were not enough to determine that requests were overly burdensome. Defendant needed to specify so court could determine.

Nature of Case: Privacy Rights, Stored Communications Act, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Electronic Data Involved: Amazon Account

Keywords: burdensome, boilerplate objections

View Case Opinion

Firefighter’s Retirement System, et al, v. Citco Group Limited, et al., No. 3:13-cv-00373-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Jan. 3, 2018)

Key Insight: Mass email to all employees of a company asking for information is not proportional, especially when custodians and search terms have already been established

Nature of Case: Securities (retirement fund investment loss)

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents, emails

Keywords: discovery, mass email, proportional, retirement,

View Case Opinion

Landry v. Swire Oilfield Servs. (New Mexico District Court, 2018)

Key Insight: Courts should be less involved in discovery dispute regarding ESI despite recent FRCP amendments

Nature of Case: Labor Standards Class Action

Electronic Data Involved: third party electronic payroll data

Keywords: FRCP 2015 amendments, electronically readable fomat

View Case Opinion

Par Pharm., Inc. v. Express Scripts Specialty Distribution Servs., Inc., No. 4:17MC510 RLW, 2018 WL 264840 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 2, 2018)

Key Insight: motion to compel production of documents including confidential patient information

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: database maintained by non-party

Keywords: undue burden and expense on a non-party, subpoena duces tecum

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.