Tag:Motion to Compel

1
Alarm Grid, Inc. v. AlarmClub.com, Inc. (Southern District of Florida, 2018)
2
Farmers New World Life Ins. Co. v. Atchison, No. CIV-17-1254-D (W.D. Okla. Dec. 17, 2018)
3
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. et al (S.D. Cal., 2018)
4
Hallmark Licensing LLC v. Dickens Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2018)
5
Dufrene v. American Tugs Inc. (District Court of Eastern Louisiana, 2018)
6
Eagle Air Med et al v. Sentinel Air Medical Alliance et al (D. Utah, 2018)
7
Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Communications Corp., No. 1:17-cv-01973 (N.D. Ill. May 17, 2018)
8
The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, et al., No. 3:16-cv-00203-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 27, 2018)
9
Triumph Controls UK Ltd & Anor v. Primus International Holding Co & Ors, [2018] EWHC 176 (TCC)
10
United States v. Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders’ and Exhibitors’ Association, No. 17-5925 (6th Cir. March 8, 2018)

Alarm Grid, Inc. v. AlarmClub.com, Inc. (Southern District of Florida, 2018)

Key Insight: Recorded phone call between party and copyright agent regarding image timing confidential at prelitigation phase

Nature of Case: copyright dispute

Electronic Data Involved: phone call recording

Keywords: protective order, confidential phone call, work-product

Identified State Rule(s): FRBC Rule 4-4.1, 4-1.2

Identified Federal Rule(s): 26(b)(3), 37(a)(5)

View Case Opinion

Farmers New World Life Ins. Co. v. Atchison, No. CIV-17-1254-D (W.D. Okla. Dec. 17, 2018)

Key Insight: law enforcement investigative privilege, law enforcement evidentiary privilege

Nature of Case: insurance coverage litigation

Electronic Data Involved: 911 recordings, video footage, photographs, witness statements, contact information, arrest and intake records

Keywords: in-camera inspection, law enforcement, investigative privilege, evidentiary privilege, particularity

View Case Opinion

Nuvasive, Inc. v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. et al (S.D. Cal., 2018)

Key Insight: Objection to RFP unreasonable on basis that opposing party failed to provide search terms since each party has independent obligation to produce relevant documents but noted failure to participate

Nature of Case: Patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: emails and business records

Keywords: search terms

View Case Opinion

Hallmark Licensing LLC v. Dickens Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff and Defendant’s motions to compel are both granted and denied in part

Nature of Case: Trademark rights, and when TM protection ends

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, telephone call, business documents, the product in question, interrogatories

Keywords: Trademark, trade secrets, modification, proportional, executive

View Case Opinion

Eagle Air Med et al v. Sentinel Air Medical Alliance et al (D. Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: ordered forensic examination and sanctions (threatened terminating sanctions) for failure to disclose reconstructed hard drive

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: computer files

Keywords: converted motion for sanctions to motion to compel

View Case Opinion

The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. Wellcare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc, et al., No. 3:16-cv-00203-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Feb. 27, 2018)

Key Insight: Discovery costs must be proportional to the amount in controversy ($20 million in dispute allows for at least $13,000 in discovery costs)

Nature of Case: Contract breach

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents/communications

Triumph Controls UK Ltd & Anor v. Primus International Holding Co & Ors, [2018] EWHC 176 (TCC)

Key Insight: Reduction of file search space can be proportional, use of CAR should be well documented and disclosed to opposing counsel

Nature of Case: Business M&A

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic records searched through computer assisted review (CAR)

View Case Opinion

United States v. Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders’ and Exhibitors’ Association, No. 17-5925 (6th Cir. March 8, 2018)

Key Insight: Provide only the information requested, especially if it is simple database records, additional work will not be compensated

Nature of Case: Horse Protection Act

Electronic Data Involved: Database records

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.