Tag:Motion to Compel

1
Frey v. Minter (M.D. Ga., 2019)
2
Simmons v. Safeway, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-5522 RJB (W.D. Wash. June 5, 2019).
3
Gates Corp. v. CRP Industries, No. 16-cv-01145 (D. Colo., 2019)
4
Doe 1 et al v. City of Chicago (N.D. Ill., 2019)
5
Jacops v. Foreportal Inc. (District Court of Nebraska, 2019)
6
Washington-St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Louisiana Generating, LLC (M.D. Louisiana, 2019)
7
Kizer et al v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Co et al (W.D. Okla., 2019)
8
Adacel, Inc. et al v. Adsync Technologies, Inc. (M.D. Fla., 2019)
9
Kratz v. Scott Hotel Group, LLC (S.D. Ind., 2019)
10
Dahmer v. Western Kentucky Univ. (Western Kentucky, 2019)

Simmons v. Safeway, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-5522 RJB (W.D. Wash. June 5, 2019).

Key Insight: Handwritten notes by Plaintiff had been produced. Plaintiff used attorney typed version to refresh memory before deposition. Court ordered production of typed notes.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Typed version of handwritten notes

Keywords: recollection refresh; deposition; privilege; work product

View Case Opinion

Gates Corp. v. CRP Industries, No. 16-cv-01145 (D. Colo., 2019)

Key Insight: The crime-fraud exception invalidates attorney client privilege protections with regards to an internal investigation of an employee now known to have stolen proprietary documents and shared them with her supervisor.

Nature of Case: Theft of confidential business documents

Electronic Data Involved: database containing proprietary information

Keywords: proprietary information, theft, crime-fraud exception

View Case Opinion

Washington-St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Louisiana Generating, LLC (M.D. Louisiana, 2019)

Key Insight: emails included third parties and were not proven to be attorney client privilege and have been improperly withheld

Nature of Case: Breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: emails improperly withheld as Attorney-client privilege.

Keywords: Attorney-client privilege, improperly withheld, emails copied to third parties.

View Case Opinion

Kizer et al v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Co et al (W.D. Okla., 2019)

Key Insight: relevant to see if distracted driving but three days worth disproportionate

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: cell phone records

Keywords: truck driver’s cell phone activity to see if distracted

View Case Opinion

Adacel, Inc. et al v. Adsync Technologies, Inc. (M.D. Fla., 2019)

Key Insight: general objections overruled and defendant ordered to produce records relating to profits, but does not have to disclose all documents relating to “methods of calculating” profits beyond what is necessary to understand

Nature of Case: Misappropriation of trade secrets

Electronic Data Involved: business records re profits

Keywords: general objection,

View Case Opinion

Kratz v. Scott Hotel Group, LLC (S.D. Ind., 2019)

Key Insight: whether original version of narrative detailing mistreatments sent to attorney was work product; whether work product privilege attached to subsequent revisions of the same

Nature of Case: Consumer Class Action

Electronic Data Involved: withheld original document

Keywords: work product, original, altered

View Case Opinion

Dahmer v. Western Kentucky Univ. (Western Kentucky, 2019)

Key Insight: Student witness statements or employee records are not FERPA protected “educational records,” FERPA can also be overcome through proper redactions and a demonstrable need for the information, no personal stakes in the outcome in the suit discourages disclosure of third party employment records

Nature of Case: Sex-based discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Various electronic records

Keywords: FERPA, Western Kentucky University, Title IX

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.