Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
Vay v. Huston (WDPa, 2016)
2
Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)
3
Brackett v. Stellar Recovery, Inc. (E.D. Tennesee, 2016)
4
McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)
5
First Fin. Sec., Inc v. Lee (D. Minn, 2016)
6
Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (Northern District of CA, 2016)
7
InternMatch, Inc. v. Nxtbigthing, LLC (N.D. Cal., 2016)
8
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe (Northern District of Illinois Court, 2016)
9
Thomley v. Bennett (S.D. Ga., 2016)
10
SEC v. CKB168 Holdings Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2016)

Vay v. Huston (WDPa, 2016)

Key Insight: Defendant alleges Plaintiff failed to produce documents and requests sanctions, including dismissal.

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: ESI and scanned PDF documents and other documents.

Keywords: Proportionality, motion to compel (not filed)

View Case Opinion

Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)

Key Insight: not ordered to reproduce production of documents in native format (with metadata) but only categories specifically requested by plaintiff

Nature of Case: wrongful termination – contract

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: native format

View Case Opinion

Brackett v. Stellar Recovery, Inc. (E.D. Tennesee, 2016)

Key Insight: No sanctions when electronically stored information is lost during ordinary course of business.

Nature of Case: Sanctions

Electronic Data Involved: electronically stored information

Keywords: Safe harbor, Rule 37(e), good faith, normal course of business, spoiliation

View Case Opinion

McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)

Key Insight: Plaintiff unsuccessfully seeks injunction to prevent destruction of certain evidence. Defendants argued that sanctions would be inappropriate and no spoliation had occurred.

Nature of Case: Inmate pro se plaintiff asserts a host of constitutional violations against the U.S. and individual prison personnel.

Electronic Data Involved: Deleted video footage.

Keywords: Failure to preserve, destruction of evidence, spoliation, adverse inference.

View Case Opinion

First Fin. Sec., Inc v. Lee (D. Minn, 2016)

Key Insight: Magistrate recommended sanctions for defendants’ willful failure to comply with his discovery order. No finding of bad faith.

Nature of Case: Breach of contract.

Electronic Data Involved: Defendant emails and text messages.

Keywords: “Strong circumstantial evidence” that the defendants had concealed documents. Adverse inference instructions and legal costs imposed by court.

View Case Opinion

Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (Northern District of CA, 2016)

Key Insight: limited additional discovery on the issue of conflict of interest and bias in the administration of the claim

Nature of Case: ERISA

Electronic Data Involved: 5 depositions and written discovery responses

Keywords: limited additional discovery, discovery duplication, scope of discovery

View Case Opinion

InternMatch, Inc. v. Nxtbigthing, LLC (N.D. Cal., 2016)

Key Insight: Failure to preserve relevant evidence.

Nature of Case: Trademark ownership dispute.

Electronic Data Involved: Defendants discarded computers, following an alleged power surge which “fried” data.

Keywords: Defendants “willfully spoliated evidence” and the “extraordinary measures Batterman undertook to mislead opposing counsel and the Court merit a finding of bad faith.”

View Case Opinion

Thomley v. Bennett (S.D. Ga., 2016)

Key Insight: whether defendants acted with prejudice in not preserving “loop type system” video footage; whether spoliation sanctions apply for destroyed evidence

Nature of Case: Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate indifference and excessive force (cruel and unusual punishment)

Electronic Data Involved: medical records

Keywords: spoliation, preserve, prejudice, intent, bad faith, loop type system

View Case Opinion

SEC v. CKB168 Holdings Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2016)

Key Insight: are the defendants acting in bad faith by not confirming that evidence doesn’t exist or was it not preserved, in that case is it sanctionable

Nature of Case: violation of Securities act, violation of the exchange act and rule 10b-5, unregistered securities offerings

Electronic Data Involved: “back office data” information as to whether defendants explored public offering

Keywords: bad faith, sanctions, spoliation, public offering

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.