Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
In re Shawe & Elting LLC, No. C.A. 9661-CB (Delaware Chancery, 2016)
2
Dynamo Holdings L.P. v. Commissioner, No. 2685-11, 8393-12 (Tax Ct. July 13, 2016).
3
Martinez v. City of Chicago, No. 14-cv-369 (N.D. Ill. June 29, 2016).
4
Arbor, LLC v. Herrick, LLP (NY AppDiv, 2016)
5
Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, No. 7:07-cv-06304-KMK (S.D.N.Y. May 25, 2016).
6
Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert v. Century Theatres (California, 2016)
7
Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2016).
8
In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc., No. 12-cv-3536 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2016).
9
Martin v. Stoops Buick, Inc. (S.D. Ind., 2016)
10
Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).

In re Shawe & Elting LLC, No. C.A. 9661-CB (Delaware Chancery, 2016)

Key Insight: Sanctions for attorney’s fees are warranted when computer files are deleted (even if they are recovered) and when a phone is recklessly lost in a “palpably suspicious” incident.

Nature of Case: Corporate management disputes between co-founders

Electronic Data Involved: cell phone contents, computer files

Keywords: spoliation, palpably suspicious, lost phone, ineffective spoliation, reckless failure to preserve

View Case Opinion

Dynamo Holdings L.P. v. Commissioner, No. 2685-11, 8393-12 (Tax Ct. July 13, 2016).

Key Insight: Predictive coding may be used to conserve time and expense where e-discovery expertise applied

Nature of Case: Embezzlement/Fraudulent Transfers Action

Electronic Data Involved: Backup storage tapes of exchange server containing tax-related information

Keywords: “computer-assisted review [tools]” “privileged or confidential information” “universe of documents”

View Case Opinion

Martinez v. City of Chicago, No. 14-cv-369 (N.D. Ill. June 29, 2016).

Key Insight: Plaintiff was arrested while police pursuing his brother. Videos from car were mis-labeled and therefore destroyed. Plaintiff could not show bad faith, so no adverse inference instruction.

Nature of Case: civil rights

Electronic Data Involved: Police Car Videos

Keywords: adverse inference; sanctions; bad faith

View Case Opinion

Arbor, LLC v. Herrick, LLP (NY AppDiv, 2016)

Key Insight: Sanctions for failure to preserve. Plaintiff did not issue a litigation hold until 23 months after reasonable anticipation of litigation.

Nature of Case: Legal malpractice

Electronic Data Involved: ESI destroyed under plaintiff’s record destruction policies: Backup tapes, routine deletion of emails, erasure of hard drives/email accounts.

Keywords: Preservation, spoliation sanctions, adverse inference charge, litigation hold.

Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, No. 7:07-cv-06304-KMK (S.D.N.Y. May 25, 2016).

Key Insight: The Village did not preserve the facebook posts or text messages despite having that duty. Court ruled that severe sanctions were warranted including an adverse inference and legal fees.

Nature of Case: discrimination; zoning

Electronic Data Involved: Facebook posts and text messages

Keywords: adverse inference; facebook, texts

View Case Opinion

Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert v. Century Theatres (California, 2016)

Key Insight: Deletion of emails at recommendation of email provider is not deletion with intent to destroy evidence, therefore terminating sanctions are overbroad

Nature of Case: Antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: Deleted emails

Keywords: Theatres, Cinemark, terminating sanctions, Bryan Cranston

View Case Opinion

Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2016).

Key Insight: Plaintiff threatened legal action, but failed to have it’s vendor stop automatic deletion and did not preserve recrods when email system changed. Defendant was prejudiced by this spoilation. Court allowed witnesses to testify to spoilation and potential contents of those communications.

Nature of Case: incentive programs and Robinson-Patman Act violations

Electronic Data Involved: internal and external communications

Keywords: spoilation; vendor

View Case Opinion

Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).

Key Insight: Court concluded defendant had duty to preserve oily substance and was negligent in doing so. Permissive adverse inference instruction granted.

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: oily substance plaintiff slipped on

Keywords: adverse inference;

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.