Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
Alston v. Park Pleasant (3rd Circuit, 2017)
2
Creighton v. City of New York (Southern District New York, 2017)
3
Shawe v. Elting (Delaware, 2017)
4
Charles v. City of New York (E.D. N.Y., 2017)
5
HCC Ins. Holdings v. Flowers, No. 1:15-cv-3262-WSD (N.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017).
6
Patrick v. Tractor Supply, Co., No. 16-10755, 2017 WL 396301 (E.D. La. Jan. 30, 2017)
7
Wali Muhammad v. Mathena, No. 7:14CV00529, 2017 WL 3955225 (W.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2017)
8
Martinz v. Salazar (District of New Mexico, 2017)
9
Morrison v. Veale, M.D., No. 3:14-cv-1020-TFM, 2017 WL 372980 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2017)
10
ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan v. Connecticut General, 3:15-cv-02965-WHA (N.D. Cal., 2017)

Alston v. Park Pleasant (3rd Circuit, 2017)

Key Insight: No spoliation because no bad faith found when party did not retain records after selling assets (including computers)

Nature of Case: workplace discrimination, disability rights

Electronic Data Involved: unspecified electronic records

Keywords: Rule 37(e) ignored,

View Case Opinion

Shawe v. Elting (Delaware, 2017)

Key Insight: Even if documents are recovered from deletion, sanctions may still be proper, sanctions are proper when failing to adhere to litigation holds, sanctions based on perjury are not criminal charges of perjury, extreme bad-faith litigation allows for cost shifting of attorney’s fees

Nature of Case: Litigation misconduct

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic files

Keywords: 7 million, sanctions, unusually deplorable, perjury, bizarre, rat droppings

Identified State Rule(s): “American Rule”

View Case Opinion

Charles v. City of New York (E.D. N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: Court ruled that it could not be inferred from mere negligence that the recording would be favorable to defendants. Other sources of information/discovery were available as well. An application of Rule 37(e) would make no difference (the rule was not cited).

Nature of Case: Civil rights

Electronic Data Involved: Deleted cell phone video

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, adverse inference

View Case Opinion

HCC Ins. Holdings v. Flowers, No. 1:15-cv-3262-WSD (N.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017).

Key Insight: Spoliation,

Nature of Case: Trade Secrets

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail accounts, electronic evidence, electronic storage devices, personal and work computers, cloud storage accounts

Keywords: Spoliation, Hot Sheets,

View Case Opinion

Patrick v. Tractor Supply, Co., No. 16-10755, 2017 WL 396301 (E.D. La. Jan. 30, 2017)

Key Insight: Trial court exercises discretion to impose sanctions (no Rule 37(e) used), no bad faith found when requesting footage of the incident where footage surrounding the incident was deleted due to normal retention policies (negligence at best)

Nature of Case: Personal injury (slip and fall)

Electronic Data Involved: Store video footage

Keywords: slip and fall, constructive notice, cable wire, summary judgment

View Case Opinion

Martinz v. Salazar (District of New Mexico, 2017)

Key Insight: Even with a litigation hold, if a party would have made no efforts to obtain a serial number, bad faith is not found. Sloppy paperwork may be considered gross negligence in a totality of the circumstances. Rule 37(e) was not used.

Nature of Case: Excessive police force

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data (Taser usage records)

Keywords: taser, cartridge, serial number, spoliation

Morrison v. Veale, M.D., No. 3:14-cv-1020-TFM, 2017 WL 372980 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2017)

Key Insight: Spoliation of evidence via a mobile device. Case filed prior to new Rule 37(e) enactment, so, rule does not apply.

Nature of Case: Fair Labor Standards Act violation

Electronic Data Involved: e-mail account records

Keywords: “old” bad faith analysis, misdirection and deception, 2-step verification.

View Case Opinion

ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan v. Connecticut General, 3:15-cv-02965-WHA (N.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: Service provider failed to preserve ESI

Nature of Case: ERISA action

Electronic Data Involved: ESI contained on servers

Keywords: failure to preserve, servers, service provider, inherent power authority

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.