Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
Estate of Shaw v. Marcus (S.D.N.Y., 2017)
2
Citibank v. Super Sayin Publishing (Southern District of NY, 2017)
3
Fischer v. Forrest (SDNY, 2017)
4
Air Products v. Wiesemann (D. Del., 2017)
5
Below v. Yokohoma Tire Corp (Western District of Wisconsin, 2017)
6
Redzepagic v. Hammer – Case Opinion (Southern District of New York, 2017)
7
Diesel Power Source et al. v. Crazy Carl’s Turbos et al., No. 14-826 (D. Utah Feb. 23, 2017)
8
Blasi v. United Debt Services (Souther District Ohio, Eastern Division, 2017)
9
Oppenheimer v. City of La Habra (Central District of California, Southern Division, 2017)
10
Alston v. Park Pleasant (3rd Circuit, 2017)

Estate of Shaw v. Marcus (S.D.N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: email

Nature of Case: Family Business dispute

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: Pattern of delinquent conduct; Complete disr4egard for court orders; failure to preserve; Zubulake

View Case Opinion

Citibank v. Super Sayin Publishing (Southern District of NY, 2017)

Key Insight: Updated spoliation rule was correctly applied to motion regarding earlier conduct because the party cited the updated rule

Nature of Case: Negotiable instrument

Electronic Data Involved: deleted electronic records, emails, text messages

Keywords: retroactive application discovery rule, ESI spoliation sanctions

Identified Local Court Rule(s): S. District N Local Civil Rule 7.1(a)(1)

View Case Opinion

Air Products v. Wiesemann (D. Del., 2017)

Key Insight: Sanctions not allowed on parties wiping laptops, because they had only been named as search terms after the other party knew that wiping had happened. No sanction for lost emails available from another source. Pure speculation is not enough to find that relevant ESI was destroyed.

Nature of Case: Securities and Commodities litigation

Electronic Data Involved: Computer log info, laptop info

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, inherent authority

View Case Opinion

Below v. Yokohoma Tire Corp (Western District of Wisconsin, 2017)

Key Insight: Negligence or even gross negligence is not necessarily bad faith and thus not spoliation

Nature of Case: Product liability

Electronic Data Involved: Car electronic data

Keywords: truck, bad faith, salvage yard, spoliation, sword, shield

View Case Opinion

Redzepagic v. Hammer – Case Opinion (Southern District of New York, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanctions denied against defendant because text messages were available from a different source, sanctions denied against plaintiff because documents were not under plaintiff’s control

Nature of Case: Fair Labor Standards Act (failure to pay overtime wages)

Electronic Data Involved: Text messages

Keywords: FLSA, Sefket, CBA,

View Case Opinion

Diesel Power Source et al. v. Crazy Carl’s Turbos et al., No. 14-826 (D. Utah Feb. 23, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff requested Defendant run 72 “spelling variations” of 5 terms allowed by prior court order. Court denied and allowed 20, but did not apply sanctions yet.

Nature of Case: Libel/Slander

Electronic Data Involved: Various ESI

Keywords: search terms; sanctions; cooperation

View Case Opinion

Blasi v. United Debt Services (Souther District Ohio, Eastern Division, 2017)

Key Insight: Party that does not dispute it spoliated ESI should be sanctioned

Nature of Case: consumer protection class action

Electronic Data Involved: deleted electronic records

Keywords: spoliation sanctions, deleted electronic records

View Case Opinion

Oppenheimer v. City of La Habra (Central District of California, Southern Division, 2017)

Key Insight: Rule 37 does not directly address destruction of video footage.

Nature of Case: prisoner suicide

Electronic Data Involved: video footage, emails, text messages

Keywords: destruction video, spoliation video

View Case Opinion

Alston v. Park Pleasant (3rd Circuit, 2017)

Key Insight: No spoliation because no bad faith found when party did not retain records after selling assets (including computers)

Nature of Case: workplace discrimination, disability rights

Electronic Data Involved: unspecified electronic records

Keywords: Rule 37(e) ignored,

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.