Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., No. 2: 11-cv-05097-FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2017)
2
Garcia v. City of Santa Clara (Northern District of California, 2017)
3
US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)
4
Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)
5
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger (U. S. Supreme Court, 2017)
6
Tchatat v. OHara (Southern District of NY, 2017)
7
Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)
8
Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank (E.D. Cal., 2017)
9
Hsueh v. New York State Dep?t of Fin. Servs (Southern District of New York, 2017)
10
Hsueh v. New York State, No. 15 cv 3401 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2017)

United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., No. 2: 11-cv-05097-FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2017)

Key Insight: Failure to issue a litigation hold, misrepresentation that a hold had been issued, spoliation of evidence, attorney fee award.

Nature of Case: water-protection law violation

Electronic Data Involved: Not specified. However, likely, email and other electronic records.

Keywords: spoliation, litigation hold, lodestar calculation, special master.

View Case Opinion

Garcia v. City of Santa Clara (Northern District of California, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanction and adverse inference inappropriate because nothing lost/destroyed was highly probative

Nature of Case: Excessive force

Electronic Data Involved: emails, reports

Keywords: adverse inference

View Case Opinion

US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)

Key Insight: Whether FRCP 37(e) applies where the duty to preserve does not arise out of the anticipation or conduct of litigation, whether sanctions issued under a court’s inherent power were appropriate

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: country of origin data

Keywords: Country of Origin documentation, adverse inference, Trade Agreements Act, inherent power, overwrite, direct proof or disproof

View Case Opinion

Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant has inadequate production even when supplemented. Judge ordered meet-and-confer to work out some of the disagreements. Judge did not give either side sanctions.

Nature of Case: Breach of Contract; Consumer Fraud

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail; Electronic Database

Keywords: Meet-and-confer; Inadequate Production; Supplemental Production

View Case Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger (U. S. Supreme Court, 2017)

Key Insight: Slow responses to discovery; withholding information; Discovery fraud

Nature of Case: Personal Injury

Electronic Data Involved: Not specifically stated “documents”

Keywords: Attorney Fees; Bad Faith; Withholding information; Misconduct; Sanctions must be compensatory not punitive; Court’s inherent authority; But-For test

View Case Opinion

Tchatat v. OHara (Southern District of NY, 2017)

Key Insight: Arrest did not trigger a duty for defendants to preserve video of alleged beating before arrest

Nature of Case: Wrongful arrest

Electronic Data Involved: video, electronic photos

Keywords: triggering duty to preserve

View Case Opinion

Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)

Key Insight: Can the court order additional discovery if a party destroys evidence? Is a prejudice ruling required in a destruction of evidence case?

Nature of Case: Retaliation and discharge

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, emails, social media messages

Keywords: Prejudice, Destruction of evidence, Social media, Text messages

View Case Opinion

Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank (E.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: Conduct discovery in good faith; Maintain a civil tone in communications; Purge of emails

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: ESI; email; SMS; Text messages

Keywords: Good Faith; Proportionality; Meet and confer; Rule 16 – Scope of discovery; Purge of emails; Complete breakdown of discovery

View Case Opinion

Hsueh v. New York State Dep?t of Fin. Servs (Southern District of New York, 2017)

Key Insight: Intentionally deleting ESI is different from failing to preserve and falls under a court’s inherent authority, not FRCP 37(e).

Nature of Case: Sexual harassment

Electronic Data Involved: Recorded conversation

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions, recording, DFS, department of financial services

View Case Opinion

Hsueh v. New York State, No. 15 cv 3401 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2017)

Key Insight: Court said 37(e) doesn’t apply when recording was intentionally deleted. Adverse inference granted for plaintiff’s deletion of an audio tape, despite its subsequent recovery and production from a hard drive backup.

Nature of Case: sexual harassment at work

Electronic Data Involved: audio tape, hard drive backup

Keywords: adverse inference, over-preservation concerns

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.