Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
Christofferson v. Malhi (D. AZ, 2017)
2
Storey v. Effingham County, No. 4:2015cv00149, 2017 WL 2623775 (S.D. Ga. June 16, 2017)
3
Henkle v. Cumberland Farms (S.D. Fla. , 2017)
4
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Gramalegui No. 1:15-cv-02313-REB-GPG (D. Colo. June 14, 2017)
5
Wiedeman v. Canal Insurance (Northern District of Georgia, 2017)
6
Brown v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (E.D. Pa, 2017)
7
Hugler v. Jasper Contractors, 1:16-cv-3845-LMM-JSA (ND Ga, 2017)
8
Hulett v. City of Syracuse (N.D. N.Y., 2017)
9
Integrated Direct Marketing v. Drew May (4th Cir., 2017)
10
CrossFit, Inc. v. Nat’l Strength & Conditioning Ass’n, No. 3:14-cv-01191-JLS-KSC (S.D. Cal. May 26, 2017)

Christofferson v. Malhi (D. AZ, 2017)

Key Insight: the failure to implement a litigation hold is an important factor in determining culpability, ?but not per evidence of culpable conduct giving rise to a presumption of relevance and prejudice.?

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: destroyed records

Keywords: litigation hold; spoliation; adverse inference; likely to result in litigation

View Case Opinion

Storey v. Effingham County, No. 4:2015cv00149, 2017 WL 2623775 (S.D. Ga. June 16, 2017)

Key Insight: Spoliation of video evidence. Evidence must have existed and been in the control of a party.

Nature of Case: civil rights action

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance and taser video

Keywords: spoliation sanctions, multi-step analysis, Rule 37(e), routine retention policy.

View Case Opinion

Henkle v. Cumberland Farms (S.D. Fla. , 2017)

Key Insight: whether sanction inappropriate absent bad faith

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: video footage

Keywords: surveillance footage, adverse inference, preservation letter, spoliation, Eleventh Circuit, prejudice, significant impairment, other available evidence

View Case Opinion

Wiedeman v. Canal Insurance (Northern District of Georgia, 2017)

Key Insight: Court used a spoliation test non-specific to electronic discovery, spoliation not found due to one defendant not in control of the evidence and the other destroying the evidence without bad faith and not when litigation was reasonably foreseeable

Nature of Case: Collision

Electronic Data Involved: ECM data

Keywords: ECM, electronic control module, spoliation

View Case Opinion

Brown v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (E.D. Pa, 2017)

Key Insight: whether the loss of a cell phone can give rise to an adverse inference re location data

Nature of Case: insurance fraud

Electronic Data Involved: lost cell phone

Keywords: spoliation; adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Hugler v. Jasper Contractors, 1:16-cv-3845-LMM-JSA (ND Ga, 2017)

Key Insight: petitioner’s motion for contempt, subpoena enforcement

Nature of Case: subpoena duces tecum issued by US Dept. of Labor to Respondent, a roofing company. Workplace safety violations and follow-up inspections..

Electronic Data Involved: text and email messages

Keywords: subpoena duces tecum, failure to take reasonable steps to comply with the order

View Case Opinion

Integrated Direct Marketing v. Drew May (4th Cir., 2017)

Key Insight: insufficient evidence to support finding of spoliation

Nature of Case: Trade secret misappropriation, breach of confidentiality agreement

Electronic Data Involved: deletion of plaintiff’s electronic files from May’s personal hard drive

Keywords: spoliation inference, trade secret misappropriation

View Case Opinion

CrossFit, Inc. v. Nat’l Strength & Conditioning Ass’n, No. 3:14-cv-01191-JLS-KSC (S.D. Cal. May 26, 2017)

Key Insight: Lack of cooperation and deception on production does not lead to terminating sanctions if evidence was not actually destroyed but does lead to adverse inferences and cost shifting

Nature of Case: Unfair Competition

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic records

Keywords: CrossFit, terminating sanctions, perjury

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.