Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
Fox v. Steepwater (D. Utah, 2018)
2
Nunes v. Rushton, No. 2:14-cv-00627-JNP (D. Utah May 14, 2018)
3
Brewer v. BNSF (D. Mont., 2018)
4
Steves and Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc. (Eastern District of Virginia, 2018)
5
Brown v. Wal-Mart Store (Northern District California, San Jose Division, 2018)
6
Heggen v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00440-TLS-SLC (N.D. Ind. April 27, 2018)
7
Manufacturing Automation v. Hughes (California, Central District, 2018)
8
Cen Com, Inc. v. Numerex Corp. (W.D. Wash., 2018)
9
Presidee Barrett v. FedEx (Middle District of Georgia, 2018)
10
Mpala v. Gateway Community College (2nd Cir., 2018)

Fox v. Steepwater (D. Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: Spoliation; duty to preserve

Nature of Case: Civil Rights Title VII – Sexual harassment

Electronic Data Involved: Notebook; earnings records

Keywords: Loss of documents; Spoliation; duty to preserve; Bad Faith; Prejudice

View Case Opinion

Nunes v. Rushton, No. 2:14-cv-00627-JNP (D. Utah May 14, 2018)

Key Insight: Intentional deletion of accounts does not lead to prejudice if the data is still accessible, but does lead to an adverse inference when the data is not

Nature of Case: Copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: “sock puppet” accounts and related data

Keywords: Sock puppet accounts, adverse inference, spoliation sanctions

View Case Opinion

Brewer v. BNSF (D. Mont., 2018)

Key Insight: A ruling of prejudice requires specificity as to documents. Intent is required for 37(3) sanctions, but courts can reserve the right to impose a lesser sanction after seeing hope evidence is presented at trial.

Nature of Case: Employment dispute

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions, prejudice, specificity

View Case Opinion

Steves and Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc. (Eastern District of Virginia, 2018)

Key Insight: Spoliation sanctions must remedy the harm caused by the loss, and if documents are produced there is little loss

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (Trade secrets)

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail

Keywords: Spoliation, sanctions

View Case Opinion

Brown v. Wal-Mart Store (Northern District California, San Jose Division, 2018)

Key Insight: A party’s late disclosure of evidence (while using it as the basis of their own expert opinion) justifies exclusion of that evidence

Nature of Case: Certified class action

Electronic Data Involved: audiovisual recordings, data logs

Keywords: late disclosure, exclusion sanctions, expert discovery cutoff, fact discovery, untimeliness

View Case Opinion

Heggen v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00440-TLS-SLC (N.D. Ind. April 27, 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff performed “factory reset” on phone, deleting videos; Plaintiff had sent to EEOC, but could not produce e-mail; Was not enough for sanction of dismissal

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Cell Phone Video

Keywords: Negligent Spoilation; Perjury; Sanctions

View Case Opinion

Manufacturing Automation v. Hughes (California, Central District, 2018)

Key Insight: Terminating sanctions for alleged email spoliation is premature without compelling the documents 1st

Nature of Case: copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: deleted emails

Keywords: software copyright, accelerated email retention policy, terminating sanctions

View Case Opinion

Cen Com, Inc. v. Numerex Corp. (W.D. Wash., 2018)

Key Insight: relevance of search terms, proportionality

Nature of Case: breach of contract, trade secrets

Keywords: sanctions, motion to compel, search terms, third-party subpoenas, personal capacity, proportionality, attorney’s fees, current version, pending motion for protective order

View Case Opinion

Mpala v. Gateway Community College (2nd Cir., 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff failed to show that he was prejudiced by the failure to preserve surveillance footage

Nature of Case: 1983 Civil rights

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance footage

Keywords: failure to preserve, prejudice, spoliation sanctions

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.