Tag:Motion for Sanctions

1
Eagle Air Med et al v. Sentinel Air Medical Alliance et al (D. Utah, 2018)
2
Steves and Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00545-REP (E.D. Va. May 1, 2018)
3
King v. Fleming, No. 17-3095 (10th Cir. Aug. 15, 2018)
4
BankDirect Capital Fin., LLC v. Capital Premium Fin., Inc., No. 1:15-cv-10340 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 4, 2018)
5
De Simone v. VSL Pharms., Inc., No. 8:15-cv-01356-TDC (D. Md. March 16, 2018)
6
Epac Technologies, Inc. v. HarperCollins Christian Publishing, Inc., f/k/a Thomas Nelson, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-00463 (M.D. Tenn. March 29, 2018)
7
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta (China) Co., Ltd. 1:17-cv-01458 (E.D. Virginia, 2018)
8
Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. et. al., v. Pitsicalis et al, No. 1:17-cv-01927-PAE (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2018)
9
Fishman v. Tiger Natural Gas (Northern District of California, 2018)
10
Folino v. Hines (District Court of Western District of Pennsylvania, 2018)

Eagle Air Med et al v. Sentinel Air Medical Alliance et al (D. Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: ordered forensic examination and sanctions (threatened terminating sanctions) for failure to disclose reconstructed hard drive

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: computer files

Keywords: converted motion for sanctions to motion to compel

View Case Opinion

Steves and Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00545-REP (E.D. Va. May 1, 2018)

Key Insight: Spoliation sanctions must remedy the harm caused by the loss, and if documents are produced there is little loss

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (Trade secrets)

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail

View Case Opinion

Epac Technologies, Inc. v. HarperCollins Christian Publishing, Inc., f/k/a Thomas Nelson, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-00463 (M.D. Tenn. March 29, 2018)

Key Insight: Gross negligence does not necessarily prove intent on loss of electronic documents

Nature of Case: Contract

Electronic Data Involved: Warehouse data, e-mails

View Case Opinion

Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta (China) Co., Ltd. 1:17-cv-01458 (E.D. Virginia, 2018)

Key Insight: Failure to produce discovery and making misrepresentations about the nature and content of documents so as to not produce them.

Nature of Case: trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: business documents, text messages, personal messages of employees.

Keywords: Compel, “chinese privacy law” misrepresentation,

View Case Opinion

Experience Hendrix, L.L.C. et. al., v. Pitsicalis et al, No. 1:17-cv-01927-PAE (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2018)

Key Insight: Failure to disclose computing devices or to preserve documents, and doing so intentionally led to an adverse inference

Nature of Case: Intellectual property infringement (trademark and copyright)

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents, text messages

Keywords: Spoliation, Hendrix, adverse inference, anti-forensic software

View Case Opinion

Fishman v. Tiger Natural Gas (Northern District of California, 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant’s unsupervised and under inclusive ESI searches remedied by additional searches and disclosure of previous search paramaters

Nature of Case: Fraudulent telemarketing

Electronic Data Involved: Audio recordings

Keywords: Telemarketing, Fishman, mortal mistake

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.