Tag:Motion for Protective Order

1
In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)
2
Landry v. Swire Oilfield Servs. (New Mexico District Court, 2018)
3
Hurd v. City of Lincoln, No. 4:16-CV-3029 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2017)
4
Duffy v. Lawrence Mem?l Hosp., No. 2:14-v-2256-SAC-TJJ, 2017 WL 1277808 (D. Kan. Mar. 31, 2017)
5
Padron v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York , Inc. (Cal. Ct. App., 4th District, 2017)
6
Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-0465-MMS (Fed. Cl. Oct. 3, 2016)
7
United States v. New Mexico State University (D. N.M., 2017)
8
Lowrey v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co., No. 2:17-cv-00831-RSL, 2017 WL 3769424 (Washington, Western District, 2017)
9
Brown v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (E.D. Pa, 2017)
10
Miller v. Zara USA, 2017 NY Slip Op 04407 [151 AD3d 462] (N.Y. App. June 6, 2017)

In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)

Key Insight: relevance and proportionality

Nature of Case: false advertising

Electronic Data Involved: documents, communications

Keywords: relevant, proportional, reconsideration, additional discovery, custodial files, protective order, third party discovery

View Case Opinion

Landry v. Swire Oilfield Servs. (New Mexico District Court, 2018)

Key Insight: Courts should be less involved in discovery dispute regarding ESI despite recent FRCP amendments

Nature of Case: Labor Standards Class Action

Electronic Data Involved: third party electronic payroll data

Keywords: FRCP 2015 amendments, electronically readable fomat

View Case Opinion

Hurd v. City of Lincoln, No. 4:16-CV-3029 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2017)

Key Insight: No produced emails were from the Mayor. Mayor’s deposition not necessary or proportional to needs of the case.

Nature of Case: employment discrimination and retaliation

Electronic Data Involved: Over 6,500 emails and attachments produced by defendant.

Keywords: Relevant and proportional, proportionality, mere conjecture and conclusory statements.

View Case Opinion

Duffy v. Lawrence Mem?l Hosp., No. 2:14-v-2256-SAC-TJJ, 2017 WL 1277808 (D. Kan. Mar. 31, 2017)

Key Insight: Despite previously ordering production of ESI, court considered motion for protective order by defendant after the ?enormity of the task became apparent? and granted the motion in light of defendant?s presentation of evidence showing that responding to the at-issue requests would take 8,982 hours of work at a cost of $230,000, if accomplished by contract staff; court indicated that it found ?merit? in Defendant?s proposal to provide a random sample of the at-issue information ?from a standpoint of accuracy,? reasoning that ?human error would be a realistic factor? if Defendant were to employ contract workers to conduct a manual review of all of the records under time constraints

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic hospital records

Padron v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York , Inc. (Cal. Ct. App., 4th District, 2017)

Key Insight: Refusal to produce documents. Clergy-penitent privilege

Nature of Case: Negligence and failure to warn (Sexual Abuse)

Electronic Data Involved: letter,email, fax,ESI

Keywords: Willful refusal to comply with discovery order; Monetary sanctions; Judicial estoppel

Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-0465-MMS (Fed. Cl. Oct. 3, 2016)

Key Insight: 1500 documents withheld as privileged under procedures in FRE 502 (d);

Nature of Case: Fifth Amendment, taking private property without just compensation

Electronic Data Involved: 1500 documents

Keywords: quick peek, privileged, taking, unjust compensation

View Case Opinion

United States v. New Mexico State University (D. N.M., 2017)

Key Insight: Should deficient search terms be supplemented using court appointed terms? And how closely should counsel work together on electronic searches?

Nature of Case: Workplace discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, documents of complaints and communication about complaints

Keywords: Keywords, Cooperation,

View Case Opinion

Lowrey v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co., No. 2:17-cv-00831-RSL, 2017 WL 3769424 (Washington, Western District, 2017)

Key Insight: The Stipulated Protective Order is too broad and is not consistent with the RCP

Nature of Case: Transgender/sex employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: confidential documents, Stipulated Protective Order

Keywords: Stipulated Protective Order, confidential, Rules of Civil Procedure

View Case Opinion

Brown v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (E.D. Pa, 2017)

Key Insight: whether the loss of a cell phone can give rise to an adverse inference re location data

Nature of Case: insurance fraud

Electronic Data Involved: lost cell phone

Keywords: spoliation; adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Miller v. Zara USA, 2017 NY Slip Op 04407 [151 AD3d 462] (N.Y. App. June 6, 2017)

Key Insight: Attorney client privilege and work product protections for communications from company devices

Nature of Case: employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Company laptop data

Keywords: attorney client privilege, computer forensics, privacy policy, work product

Identified State Rule(s): CPLR 3103

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.