Tag:Motion for Protective Order

1
Katz et al. v. Liberty Power Corp., LLC et al. – 18-cv-10506-ADB (District of Mass. , 2019)
2
Bombardier Inc. v. Mitsubishi Aircraft Corp. (Western District of Washington, 2019)
3
Alarm Grid, Inc. v. AlarmClub.com, Inc. (Southern District of Florida, 2018)
4
Hallmark Licensing LLC v. Dickens Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2018)
5
TrueNorth Cos., LC v. TruNorth Warranty Plans of N. Am. (Northern District of Iowa, 2018)
6
Jared M. Villery v. Jeffrey Beard, et al., 1:15-cv-00987-DAD-BAM (PC), (California, Eastern District, 2018)
7
United States v. Kemp (E.D. Mich., 2018)
8
Fish v. Kobach (D. Kan. , 2018)
9
d?Amico Dry v. Nikka Finance, Inc. (S.D. Ala., 2018)
10
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Grande Comuns. Networks, LLC (W.D. Tex., 2018)

Katz et al. v. Liberty Power Corp., LLC et al. – 18-cv-10506-ADB (District of Mass. , 2019)

Key Insight: whether discovery can be bifurcated for the purpose of a dispositive motion and third party discovery

Nature of Case: Violation of the Telephone Consumer protection Act of 1991.

Electronic Data Involved: bifurcated discovery, emails, third party telephone records

Keywords: bifurcated discovery, class discovery, stayed discovery,

View Case Opinion

Bombardier Inc. v. Mitsubishi Aircraft Corp. (Western District of Washington, 2019)

Key Insight: Documents can be sealed if they are contain trade secrets and the unsealed exhibits attached to the sealed exhibits could reveal them.

Nature of Case: trade secret misappropriation

Electronic Data Involved: documents

Keywords: motion to seal, trade secrets

Identified Local Court Rule(s): 5(g)(3)(A) Motion to Seal, 5(g)(3)(B)

View Case Opinion

Alarm Grid, Inc. v. AlarmClub.com, Inc. (Southern District of Florida, 2018)

Key Insight: Recorded phone call between party and copyright agent regarding image timing confidential at prelitigation phase

Nature of Case: copyright dispute

Electronic Data Involved: phone call recording

Keywords: protective order, confidential phone call, work-product

Identified State Rule(s): FRBC Rule 4-4.1, 4-1.2

Identified Federal Rule(s): 26(b)(3), 37(a)(5)

View Case Opinion

Hallmark Licensing LLC v. Dickens Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff and Defendant’s motions to compel are both granted and denied in part

Nature of Case: Trademark rights, and when TM protection ends

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, telephone call, business documents, the product in question, interrogatories

Keywords: Trademark, trade secrets, modification, proportional, executive

View Case Opinion

TrueNorth Cos., LC v. TruNorth Warranty Plans of N. Am. (Northern District of Iowa, 2018)

Key Insight: Protective order barring opposing council from viewing confidential materials denied for being too far

Nature of Case: trademark infringement, unfair competition

Electronic Data Involved: expert information

Keywords: trademark, protective order

View Case Opinion

Jared M. Villery v. Jeffrey Beard, et al., 1:15-cv-00987-DAD-BAM (PC), (California, Eastern District, 2018)

Key Insight: What amounts to good cause to seal relevant evidence from public view

Nature of Case: Civil Rights Action, violation of 8th amendment

Electronic Data Involved: confidential health information and confidential investigatory information obtained from witness interviews

Keywords: HIPPA, seal, confidential health information, good cause

View Case Opinion

d?Amico Dry v. Nikka Finance, Inc. (S.D. Ala., 2018)

Key Insight: With prior notive, any party can specify another method of recording testimony than was in the original notice

Nature of Case: Admiralty action

Electronic Data Involved: Videotaped deposition

Keywords: Protective orders, EU,

View Case Opinion

UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Grande Comuns. Networks, LLC (W.D. Tex., 2018)

Key Insight: Should a party conduct a relevance review before returning requested discovery to the opposing side?

Nature of Case: Copyright

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails

Keywords: relevancy review, ESI, search terms

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.