Tag:Motion for Protective Order

1
Allscripts Healthcare, LLC v. DR/Decision Resources, LLC d/b/a Decision Resources Group (District of Massachusetts, 2020)
2
Taylor v. Kilmer (Northern District of Illionis, 2020)
3
Rhino Metals, Inc. v. Sturdy Gun Safe, Inc. (District of Idaho, 2020)
4
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc., No. 17-1156-EFM (D. Kan. Sept. 20, 2019).
5
In re Verizon Wireless (D. Md., 2019)
6
True Freight Logistics LLC et al v. Global Tranz Enterprises Incorporated et al (D. Ariz., 2019)
7
Strough v. General Motors, LLC (District of Colorado, 2019)
8
Lotus Indus., LLC v. Archer (E.D. Mich., 2019)
9
Adacel, Inc. et al v. Adsync Technologies, Inc. (M.D. Fla., 2019)
10
Langley v. International Business Machines Corp. (W.D.Tex., 2019)

Allscripts Healthcare, LLC v. DR/Decision Resources, LLC d/b/a Decision Resources Group (District of Massachusetts, 2020)

Key Insight: enhancement of protective order to ensure heightened confidentiality of one document.

Nature of Case: breach of contract and false and misleading statements

Electronic Data Involved: confidentiality of proprietary aggregate data product

Keywords: protective order, heightened confidentiality

View Case Opinion

Taylor v. Kilmer (Northern District of Illionis, 2020)

Key Insight: argue that those requests and subpoenas are overly broad

Nature of Case: Motor vehicle accident negligence, personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: medical bills, records, and data for treatment received over a year before incident pertaining to rate of reimbursement

Keywords: subpoena, provider billing structure, medical billing and records, overly broad and burdensome

View Case Opinion

Rhino Metals, Inc. v. Sturdy Gun Safe, Inc. (District of Idaho, 2020)

Key Insight: two reports for different suits, written by the same expert. defendants in those cases subpoenaed each other’s report to get it without confidentiality restrictions

Nature of Case: intellectual property infringement

Electronic Data Involved: expert report deemed confidential

Keywords: subpoena, expert report, confidential, privilege, protective order

View Case Opinion

Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc., No. 17-1156-EFM (D. Kan. Sept. 20, 2019).

Key Insight: Sanctions granted for first claiming withholding all responsive documents, then claiming there were no responsive documents. Protective Order violated by using information obtained under protective order to locate public information.

Nature of Case: false advertising/trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Document related to claimed settlement achieved

Keywords: privilege, sanctions

View Case Opinion

True Freight Logistics LLC et al v. Global Tranz Enterprises Incorporated et al (D. Ariz., 2019)

Key Insight: production from additional custodians not justified because expensive and not fruitful to date

Nature of Case: TRO

Electronic Data Involved: emails

Keywords: additional custodians

View Case Opinion

Strough v. General Motors, LLC (District of Colorado, 2019)

Key Insight: protective order without a sharing provision is unfair to future similarily situated plaintiffs.

Nature of Case: product liability

Electronic Data Involved: All relevant discovery

Keywords: protective order, sharing provision, class action, similarly situated plaintiff

View Case Opinion

Lotus Indus., LLC v. Archer (E.D. Mich., 2019)

Key Insight: Whether a subpoenaed third party is entitled to costs and portion of fees before engaging in document processing

Nature of Case: RICO and First Amendment Retaliation

Electronic Data Involved: documents

Keywords: fee shifting, undue burden, costs and fees

View Case Opinion

Adacel, Inc. et al v. Adsync Technologies, Inc. (M.D. Fla., 2019)

Key Insight: general objections overruled and defendant ordered to produce records relating to profits, but does not have to disclose all documents relating to “methods of calculating” profits beyond what is necessary to understand

Nature of Case: Misappropriation of trade secrets

Electronic Data Involved: business records re profits

Keywords: general objection,

View Case Opinion

Langley v. International Business Machines Corp. (W.D.Tex., 2019)

Key Insight: Are the identities of Individuals who leaked documents important?

Nature of Case: Age Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Presentation slides, Business planning documents

Keywords: Informant’s privilege, confidential informant

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.