Tag:Lack of Cooperation / Inaccurate Representations

1
Digital Mentor, Inc. v. Ovivo USA, LLC (Western District of Washington, 2020)
2
Mannion, et al. v. Ameri-Can Freight Systems Incorporated, et al. (district of AZ, 2020)
3
Slingerland v. Crisp Marketing, LLC (Southern District of Florida, 2020)
4
Healthplan Serv., Inc. v. Dixit, et al (M.D. Florida, 2019)
5
Center for Auto Safety et al. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Arizona Court of Appeals, 2019)
6
Estate of Felipe A. Radelat (Tex. App., 2019)
7
Guarisco v. Boh Brothers Construction, No. 18-7514 (E.D. La. Oct. 3, 2019).
8
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc., No. 17-1156-EFM (D. Kan. Sept. 20, 2019).
9
Abdul Latif Jameel Transportation Company Limited v. FedEx Corporation, No. 19-5315 (US Court of Appeals 6th Circuit. , 2019)
10
Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. Heath et al (D. Kan., 2019)

Digital Mentor, Inc. v. Ovivo USA, LLC (Western District of Washington, 2020)

Key Insight: Failure to produce; Sanctions; Proportionality

Nature of Case: Trademark & Copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Hard copy; correspondence; email

Keywords: “Functional employee”; Consultant; Third-party communications; Privilege; Spoliation; Unfair prejudice; Attorney’s fees and costs; Proportionality; Access/Resources;

View Case Opinion

Mannion, et al. v. Ameri-Can Freight Systems Incorporated, et al. (district of AZ, 2020)

Key Insight: whether the issue of spoliation could be brought before the jury to decide if evidence was withheld and if that was justified

Nature of Case: personal injury, motor vehicle

Electronic Data Involved: Log books of defendant

Keywords: spoliation, jury instruction, question of law/fact

View Case Opinion

Slingerland v. Crisp Marketing, LLC (Southern District of Florida, 2020)

Key Insight: discovery requests overbroad

Nature of Case: telephone consumer protection act

Electronic Data Involved: general discovery

Keywords: scope of relevant discovery, class action

View Case Opinion

Center for Auto Safety et al. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Arizona Court of Appeals, 2019)

Key Insight: defendants perpetrated fraud and acted in bad faith when not disclosing test results of defective product

Nature of Case: product liability

Electronic Data Involved: product test results that were not disclosed

Keywords: fraud, bad faith, disclosure, confidentiality

Identified Local Court Rule(s): Maricopa county local practice rule 2.19, 5.4

Identified State Rule(s): 26(c)(1), 26(c)(1)(G), 26(c)(4)(A)

View Case Opinion

Estate of Felipe A. Radelat (Tex. App., 2019)

Key Insight: Sanctions, Efforts to Thwart discovery, Fraudulent Concealment

Nature of Case: Estates and Trusts

Electronic Data Involved: Hard copy

Keywords: fraudulent concealment, Statute of Limitations, Sanctions, Violation of Court Orders, Failure to produce, Death Penalty sanction, Obstruction, Temporary injunction, Deception of the Court

Identified State Rule(s): Tex. R. Civ. P. 199.3; Tex.R. Civ. P. 176 .8 (a)

Guarisco v. Boh Brothers Construction, No. 18-7514 (E.D. La. Oct. 3, 2019).

Key Insight: Party could still be sanctioned to pay expert fees where party unsuccessfully altered evidence.

Nature of Case: Automobile accident.

Electronic Data Involved: Photographs and videos.

Keywords: “altering” “deleting” “deliberate[ly]” “computer scientist” “Facebook post”

View Case Opinion

Brave Law Firm, LLC v. Truck Accident Lawyers Group, Inc., No. 17-1156-EFM (D. Kan. Sept. 20, 2019).

Key Insight: Sanctions granted for first claiming withholding all responsive documents, then claiming there were no responsive documents. Protective Order violated by using information obtained under protective order to locate public information.

Nature of Case: false advertising/trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Document related to claimed settlement achieved

Keywords: privilege, sanctions

View Case Opinion

Abdul Latif Jameel Transportation Company Limited v. FedEx Corporation, No. 19-5315 (US Court of Appeals 6th Circuit. , 2019)

Key Insight: Whether the private arbitration panel in this case is considered a “foreign or international tribunal” and therefore whether discovery may be ordered under section 1782(a)

Nature of Case: contract dispute, application for arbitration discovery

Electronic Data Involved: arbitration discovery and “foreign or international tribunal”

Keywords: arbitration, ordered discovery, “foreign or international tribunal”

View Case Opinion

Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. Heath et al (D. Kan., 2019)

Key Insight: ordered to produce a sample of 10 calls chosen by requesting party to see if information duplicative

Nature of Case: RICO

Electronic Data Involved: audio recordings of phone calls

Keywords: credit collector sues firm representing debtors

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.