Tag:FRCP 37(e) Preservation (effective Dec. 1, 2015)

1
In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc., No. 12-cv-3536 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2016).
2
Martin v. Stoops Buick, Inc. (S.D. Ind., 2016)
3
Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).
4
Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)
5
McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)
6
Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (Northern District of CA, 2016)
7
InternMatch, Inc. v. Nxtbigthing, LLC (N.D. Cal., 2016)
8
Thomley v. Bennett (S.D. Ga., 2016)
9
SEC v. CKB168 Holdings Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2016)
10
Granados v. Traffic Bar and Restaurant, Inc. (S.D.N.Y., 2015)

Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).

Key Insight: Court concluded defendant had duty to preserve oily substance and was negligent in doing so. Permissive adverse inference instruction granted.

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: oily substance plaintiff slipped on

Keywords: adverse inference;

View Case Opinion

Spring v. Board of Trustees of Cape Fear Community College (S.D. Ind., 2016)

Key Insight: not ordered to reproduce production of documents in native format (with metadata) but only categories specifically requested by plaintiff

Nature of Case: wrongful termination – contract

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: native format

View Case Opinion

McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)

Key Insight: Plaintiff unsuccessfully seeks injunction to prevent destruction of certain evidence. Defendants argued that sanctions would be inappropriate and no spoliation had occurred.

Nature of Case: Inmate pro se plaintiff asserts a host of constitutional violations against the U.S. and individual prison personnel.

Electronic Data Involved: Deleted video footage.

Keywords: Failure to preserve, destruction of evidence, spoliation, adverse inference.

View Case Opinion

Sender v. Franklin Resources, Inc. (Northern District of CA, 2016)

Key Insight: limited additional discovery on the issue of conflict of interest and bias in the administration of the claim

Nature of Case: ERISA

Electronic Data Involved: 5 depositions and written discovery responses

Keywords: limited additional discovery, discovery duplication, scope of discovery

View Case Opinion

InternMatch, Inc. v. Nxtbigthing, LLC (N.D. Cal., 2016)

Key Insight: Failure to preserve relevant evidence.

Nature of Case: Trademark ownership dispute.

Electronic Data Involved: Defendants discarded computers, following an alleged power surge which “fried” data.

Keywords: Defendants “willfully spoliated evidence” and the “extraordinary measures Batterman undertook to mislead opposing counsel and the Court merit a finding of bad faith.”

View Case Opinion

Thomley v. Bennett (S.D. Ga., 2016)

Key Insight: whether defendants acted with prejudice in not preserving “loop type system” video footage; whether spoliation sanctions apply for destroyed evidence

Nature of Case: Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate indifference and excessive force (cruel and unusual punishment)

Electronic Data Involved: medical records

Keywords: spoliation, preserve, prejudice, intent, bad faith, loop type system

View Case Opinion

SEC v. CKB168 Holdings Inc. (E.D.N.Y., 2016)

Key Insight: are the defendants acting in bad faith by not confirming that evidence doesn’t exist or was it not preserved, in that case is it sanctionable

Nature of Case: violation of Securities act, violation of the exchange act and rule 10b-5, unregistered securities offerings

Electronic Data Involved: “back office data” information as to whether defendants explored public offering

Keywords: bad faith, sanctions, spoliation, public offering

View Case Opinion

Granados v. Traffic Bar and Restaurant, Inc. (S.D.N.Y., 2015)

Key Insight: if sanctions can be granted for inconsistent and incomplete response from opposing party

Nature of Case: violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law

Electronic Data Involved: initial interrogatories and verifications

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, default judgment, defunct business, unreachable party

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.