Tag:FRCP 37(e) Preservation (effective Dec. 1, 2015)

1
Storey v. Effingham County, No. 4:2015cv00149, 2017 WL 2623775 (S.D. Ga. June 16, 2017)
2
Brown v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (E.D. Pa, 2017)
3
Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc., No. 7:16-CV-18-D (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017).
4
Hulett v. City of Syracuse (N.D. N.Y., 2017)
5
Taylor v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., d/b/a Rite-Aid, No. 16-00474 (D. Or. May 12, 2017)
6
Distefano v. Law Offices of Barbara H. Katsos, PC (E.D.N.Y., 2017)
7
Montgomery v. Iron Rooster, No. RDB-16-3760 (D. Md. May 9, 2017)
8
Aronstein v. Thompson Creek Metals (D. Colo., 2017)
9
United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., No. 2: 11-cv-05097-FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2017)
10
US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)

Storey v. Effingham County, No. 4:2015cv00149, 2017 WL 2623775 (S.D. Ga. June 16, 2017)

Key Insight: Spoliation of video evidence. Evidence must have existed and been in the control of a party.

Nature of Case: civil rights action

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance and taser video

Keywords: spoliation sanctions, multi-step analysis, Rule 37(e), routine retention policy.

View Case Opinion

Brown v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (E.D. Pa, 2017)

Key Insight: whether the loss of a cell phone can give rise to an adverse inference re location data

Nature of Case: insurance fraud

Electronic Data Involved: lost cell phone

Keywords: spoliation; adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc., No. 7:16-CV-18-D (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017).

Key Insight: Jury Instruction due to failure to preserve electronically stored information.

Nature of Case: Defamation

Electronic Data Involved: Web browser history, Internet browser

Keywords: Web browser history, Spoliation

View Case Opinion

Taylor v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., d/b/a Rite-Aid, No. 16-00474 (D. Or. May 12, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant had reviewed video recording twice and did not show area of spill and fall. Deleted recording per their normal 37 day video retention policy. Defendant moved for summary judgment, Plaintiff argued should be sanctioned by not granting order. Judge granted summary judgment.

Nature of Case: Personal Injury

Electronic Data Involved: Video Recording

Keywords: Summary Judgment; Retention Policy

View Case Opinion

Distefano v. Law Offices of Barbara H. Katsos, PC (E.D.N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: To what extent can a party be punished for spoliation under Rule 37(e)? How much does state of mind at the time of spoliation affect the sanction?

Nature of Case: Legal malpractice

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, electronically-stored records

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions, innocence

View Case Opinion

Montgomery v. Iron Rooster, No. RDB-16-3760 (D. Md. May 9, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanctions for spoliation of evidence resulting from good faith destruction of cell phone

Nature of Case: labor violations

Electronic Data Involved: text messages

Keywords: spoliation, smartphone, intent to deprive

View Case Opinion

Aronstein v. Thompson Creek Metals (D. Colo., 2017)

Key Insight: Spoliation sanctions denied because the documents still exist, and were only transferred.

Nature of Case: False representation of a company to others and the public

Electronic Data Involved: information from a computer and shared drive

Keywords: Transferrence of ESI, spoliation sanctions,

View Case Opinion

United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., No. 2: 11-cv-05097-FMO (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2017)

Key Insight: Failure to issue a litigation hold, misrepresentation that a hold had been issued, spoliation of evidence, attorney fee award.

Nature of Case: water-protection law violation

Electronic Data Involved: Not specified. However, likely, email and other electronic records.

Keywords: spoliation, litigation hold, lodestar calculation, special master.

View Case Opinion

US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)

Key Insight: Whether FRCP 37(e) applies where the duty to preserve does not arise out of the anticipation or conduct of litigation, whether sanctions issued under a court’s inherent power were appropriate

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: country of origin data

Keywords: Country of Origin documentation, adverse inference, Trade Agreements Act, inherent power, overwrite, direct proof or disproof

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.