Tag:FRCP 37(e) Preservation (effective Dec. 1, 2015)

1
Love v. City of Chicago (N.D. Ill., 2017)
2
U.S. EEOC v. GMRI (S.D. Fla., 2017)
3
Fitzpatrick v. Sgt. Verheyen (E.D. Wisc., 2017)
4
Carpenter v. All American Games, No. CV16-01768-PHX DGC, 2017 WL 4517081 (D. Ariz. Oct. 10, 2017).
5
Rhoda v. Rhoda (S.D.N.Y., 2017)
6
Catrinar v. Wynnestone Communities Corp., et al., No. 14-11872 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2017)
7
Title Capital Mgt. v. Progress Residential (S.D. Fla., 2017)
8
Moody v. CSX Transportation (W.D.N.Y. , 2017)
9
Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC, No. 17-cv-00808-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Sept. 20, 2017)
10
Barry v. Big M Transportation, No. 1:16-cv-00167-JEO, 2017 WL 3980549 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 11, 2017)

Love v. City of Chicago (N.D. Ill., 2017)

Key Insight: Applying the former version of Rule 37(e), because the current version is not retroactive, there is no duty to preserve regularly overwritten business audio recordings absent notice to do so.

Nature of Case: Many, including unlawful arrest

Electronic Data Involved: telephone recordings and video and audio

Keywords: duty to preserve, spoliation sanctions,

View Case Opinion

U.S. EEOC v. GMRI (S.D. Fla., 2017)

Key Insight: whether missing evidence is crucial to movant’s case, whether non-movant had intent to deprive

Nature of Case: employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: hard copy, email

Keywords: duty to preserve, litigation hold, permissible inference, bad faith

View Case Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Sgt. Verheyen (E.D. Wisc., 2017)

Key Insight: Not organizing surveillance videos so that they could be promptly located was not found to be an “intent to deprive”

Nature of Case: Civil rights

Electronic Data Involved: Video

Keywords: video, intent, spoliation sanctions

View Case Opinion

Carpenter v. All American Games, No. CV16-01768-PHX DGC, 2017 WL 4517081 (D. Ariz. Oct. 10, 2017).

Key Insight: Failure to address standards for spoliation of ESI, no showing of entitlement to adverse inference instruction.

Nature of Case: defamation

Electronic Data Involved: AGGIS and Cybersource systems

Keywords: adverse inference instruction

View Case Opinion

Rhoda v. Rhoda (S.D.N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: which version of FRCP 37(e) should be applied where the issue was raised before the new version became effected but the motion was filed, whether after its effective date?

Nature of Case: employment

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: adverse instruction, intent to deprive, duty to preserve, culpability, web hosting, relevance, prejudice

View Case Opinion

Catrinar v. Wynnestone Communities Corp., et al., No. 14-11872 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff produced two versions of email (both dated before filing). Defendant argued one was fake and an attempt to bolster Plaintiff’s claim. Court deemed that dismissal was too harsh a sanction and denied dismissal sanction request.

Nature of Case: Family Medical Leave Act Violations

Electronic Data Involved: E-Mails

Keywords: Duplicate E-mail; Dismissal Sanction

View Case Opinion

Title Capital Mgt. v. Progress Residential (S.D. Fla., 2017)

Key Insight: The onset of the duty under Rule 37(e) does not have to say which exact kind of litigation that will occur. Prejudice was not found, but the question of intent was pushed to later.

Nature of Case: Contract, copyright

Electronic Data Involved: records, documents, and logs of the company

Keywords: Spoliation, intent to deprive, sanctions, prejudice

View Case Opinion

Moody v. CSX Transportation (W.D.N.Y. , 2017)

Key Insight: failure to take reasonable steps to preserve data, prejudice to other party, intent to deprive

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: event recorder data: .dat file

Keywords: reasonable steps, adverse inference, relevance of data, event recorder, black box, laptop crash, prejudice, inferred intent to deprive

View Case Opinion

Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC, No. 17-cv-00808-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Sept. 20, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff had kept a journal which was scanned and provided. Original Hard Copy was then destroyed. Judge granted motion for additional deposition time, but denied adverse inference instruction.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination; Wrongful Termination

Electronic Data Involved: Hard Copy of Scanned Journal

Keywords: Sanctions, Adverse Inference, Scanned Copy, Hard Copy

View Case Opinion

Barry v. Big M Transportation, No. 1:16-cv-00167-JEO, 2017 WL 3980549 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 11, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant’s failure to preserve the relevant ESI.

Nature of Case: Motor vehicle accident

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic Data/Electronic Control Module (ECM) Vehicle Data Recorder/Black Box and associated data.

Keywords: Spoliation, ECM data

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.