Tag:Discoverability Scope, Including FRCP 26(b)(1) Scope (Prior to Dec. 1, 2015)

1
2
Van v. Language Line Servs. (United States District Court Northern District of California, 2016)
3
Dao v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Northern District of CA, 2016)
4
Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor, LLC v. Amex Nooter, LLC (Northern District of Indiana, 2016)
5
Bazzi v. YP Advertising & Publishing, LLC (Eastern District of Michigan, 2016)
6
In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability Litigation (Eastern district of Louisiana MDL, 2016)
7
Washburn v. Lavoie, 437 F.3d 84 (D.C. Cir. 2006)
8
Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2006 WL 1120632 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2006)
9
Cahill v. Doe, 879 A.2d 943 (Del. Super. Ct. 2005)
10
McDougal-Wilson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 232 F.R.D. 246 (E.D.N.C. 2005)

Van v. Language Line Servs. (United States District Court Northern District of California, 2016)

Key Insight: E-mail request must be proportional to the evidentiary needs of the case.

Nature of Case: Request for Production

Electronic Data Involved: e-mail

Keywords: DDJR, “tactical” gamesmanship, Van’s earing statements, Allison,

View Case Opinion

Dao v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Northern District of CA, 2016)

Key Insight: if the balance of the discovery requests outweighed their benefit

Nature of Case: Breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud , negligent misrepresentation, declaratory relief and unfair competition.

Electronic Data Involved: responses of three interrogatories in light of changes to rule 26

Keywords: proportionality, motion to compel, balance of request, benefit of requested discovery

View Case Opinion

Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor, LLC v. Amex Nooter, LLC (Northern District of Indiana, 2016)

Key Insight: confidential settlement information in documents requested

Nature of Case: Negligence and breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: communications between Amex Nooter and IOSHA

Keywords: Confidential Settlement information, motion to compel, impeachment

View Case Opinion

Bazzi v. YP Advertising & Publishing, LLC (Eastern District of Michigan, 2016)

Key Insight: forensic imaging of USB drive of handwritten notes and reopening of deposition for questioning regarding the notes

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: handwritten notes from plantiff

Keywords: delaying tactics, reopening deposition, disclosure of evidence at deposition, relevancy

View Case Opinion

In re Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) Products Liability Litigation (Eastern district of Louisiana MDL, 2016)

Key Insight: personnel files are not maintained by the custodian, they are maintained by HR and contain personal information and are not discoverable

Nature of Case: products liability

Electronic Data Involved: employee personnel files of people that plaintiffs want to depose

Keywords: discoverability, relevancy, personnel files

View Case Opinion

Washburn v. Lavoie, 437 F.3d 84 (D.C. Cir. 2006)

Key Insight: Magistrate did not err in refusing to order defendants to produce all emails that mentioned plaintiff or plaintiff’s lawsuit, where magistrate did order defendants to produce the emails for in camera inspection and magistrate’s personal review showed that nearly half were devoid of anything bearing upon the litigation and the other half dealt with irrelevant issues such as the costs of litigation, retention of counsel and the need to answer interrogatories

Nature of Case: Defamation

Electronic Data Involved: Email

Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2006 WL 1120632 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2006)

Key Insight: Court found that the computerized claim file was clearly relevant, irrespective of whether plaintiffs intended to use the documents or not in the litigation, and ordered plaintiffs to produce the complete claim file, including hard copies and electronic documents, to the extent such documents were not privileged or prepared for the sole purpose of “probable” or “imminent” litigation

Nature of Case: Insurance coverage

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic claim file

Cahill v. Doe, 879 A.2d 943 (Del. Super. Ct. 2005)

Key Insight: Court denied John Doe’s motion for protective order preventing internet service provider from disclosing his identity, finding that (1) plaintiffs had, in good faith, alleged that John Doe had used the internet as a tool for defamation, (2) the identifying information sought was directly and materially related to thir claim, and (3) the information could not be obtained from any other source

Nature of Case: Elected town council member and wife sued anonymous user of an internet “blog” who posted defamatory statements about plaintiffs on blog

Electronic Data Involved: Blog posting

McDougal-Wilson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 232 F.R.D. 246 (E.D.N.C. 2005)

Key Insight: Court denied plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to produce (among other things) computer generated employee profiles of all its employees in North Carolina from 1995 to the present, finding that producing records of over 1,000 employees who were not similarly situated to plaintiff would be unduly burdensome and oppressive and was unlikely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Computer generated employee profiles

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.