Tag:Discoverability Scope, Including FRCP 26(b)(1) Scope (Prior to Dec. 1, 2015)

1
Harper v. City of Dallas (N.D. Tex., 2017)
2
Ehrenberg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 16-17269 (E.D. La. Aug. 18, 2017).
3
Parris v. Pappas (D. Conn., 2017)
4
T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)
5
In Re State Farm Lloyds, Relator, Nos. 15-0903, 15-0905 (Tex. Sup. Ct. May 26, 2017)
6
Abbott v. Wyoming Cty. Sheriff?s Office, No. 15-CV-531W (W.D.N.Y. May 16, 2017)
7
Westfield Ins. Co. v. Icon Legacy Custom Modular Homes, 321 F.R.D. 107 (4:15-cv-00539) (M.D. Pa. 2017).
8
Gordon v. T.G.R. Logistics, Inc., No. 16-cv-00238-NDF (D. Wyo. May 10, 2017)
9
Engurasoff v. Coca-Cola Refreshments (Northern District of California, 2017)
10
Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Harper v. City of Dallas (N.D. Tex., 2017)

Key Insight: Court refused to grant relief under 37(e) because moving party failed to show that ESI was lost because of a failure to take reasonable steps/

Nature of Case: wrongful death, unlawful arrest

Electronic Data Involved: email, telephone recordings

Keywords: Reasonable steps, sanctions, deleted ESI

View Case Opinion

Ehrenberg v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 16-17269 (E.D. La. Aug. 18, 2017).

Key Insight: Data link

Nature of Case: Insurance claim, Personal injury action

Electronic Data Involved: Documents, social media records including Facebook/ Twitter?Instagram ” data link”. photos

Keywords: Personal injury, Insurance claim, “data link”.

View Case Opinion

Parris v. Pappas (D. Conn., 2017)

Key Insight: Documents in plaintiff’s girlfriend’s possession could not be compelled, because the girlfriend refused to produce them.

Nature of Case: Civil Rights action

Electronic Data Involved: documents held by third party

Keywords: practical ability test, proportionality, third party subpoena

View Case Opinion

T.D.P. v. City of Oakland (Northern District California, San Francisco Division, 2017)

Key Insight: Keyword searching alone may not be sufficient and can be aided by strategies like predictive coding

Nature of Case: civil rights, fourth amendment

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, social media posts

Keywords: keyword searching, predictive coding

View Case Opinion

Abbott v. Wyoming Cty. Sheriff?s Office, No. 15-CV-531W (W.D.N.Y. May 16, 2017)

Key Insight: Discovery had been completed in September 2016. In February 2017, at deposition, additional on-going claims were presented. Court specified search terms to use against 3 custodians for the additional time frame.

Nature of Case: American with Disabilities; Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail

Keywords: Search Terms, Supplemental Production; Additional Discovery

View Case Opinion

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Icon Legacy Custom Modular Homes, 321 F.R.D. 107 (4:15-cv-00539) (M.D. Pa. 2017).

Key Insight: Contract was not ambiguous so extrinsic evidence not admissable. Therefore discovery of file was not proportional or calculated to lead to admissable evidence.

Nature of Case: declaratory judgment and bad faith

Electronic Data Involved: underwriters claim file

Keywords: admissability; proportionality; extrinsic evidence

View Case Opinion

Gordon v. T.G.R. Logistics, Inc., No. 16-cv-00238-NDF (D. Wyo. May 10, 2017)

Key Insight: Limiting the scope of discovery requests for full social media account history

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: Facebook account history

Keywords: social media, Facebook, proportionality, burdensome discovery

View Case Opinion

Engurasoff v. Coca-Cola Refreshments (Northern District of California, 2017)

Key Insight: Disclosing legal advice to third parties that need to know via email maintains attorney client privilege

Nature of Case: class action

Electronic Data Involved: archived email

Keywords: timeliness, third parties need to know, attorney client privilege

Identified State Rule(s): Ca. Evidence Code 952

View Case Opinion

Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant has inadequate production even when supplemented. Judge ordered meet-and-confer to work out some of the disagreements. Judge did not give either side sanctions.

Nature of Case: Breach of Contract; Consumer Fraud

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail; Electronic Database

Keywords: Meet-and-confer; Inadequate Production; Supplemental Production

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.