Tag:Discoverability Scope, Including FRCP 26(b)(1) Scope (Prior to Dec. 1, 2015)

1
In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)
2
Apex Mort. Corp. v. Great N. Ins. Co., No, 17 C 3376 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2018)
3
Tsanacas v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 17-CV-00306 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2018).
4
Par Pharm., Inc. v. Express Scripts Specialty Distribution Servs., Inc., No. 4:17MC510 RLW, 2018 WL 264840 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 2, 2018)
5
Hurd v. City of Lincoln, No. 4:16-CV-3029 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2017)
6
Klein v. Board of Trustees (D. Alaska, 2017)
7
8
Holick v. Burkhart ( No. 16-1188-JTM (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2017), 2017)
9
Gottesman v. Santana, No. 16-cv-2902 JLS (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2017)
10
Marsteller v. Butterfield 8 Stamford LLC, et al. – 3:17-cv-01371 (District of Connecticut, 2017)

In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig. (W.D. Mo., 2018)

Key Insight: relevance and proportionality

Nature of Case: false advertising

Electronic Data Involved: documents, communications

Keywords: relevant, proportional, reconsideration, additional discovery, custodial files, protective order, third party discovery

View Case Opinion

Apex Mort. Corp. v. Great N. Ins. Co., No, 17 C 3376 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2018)

Key Insight: Court narrowed scope of some plaintiff requests and ordered defendant to clarify privilege claims on withheld documents

Nature of Case: bad faith; insurance coverage

Electronic Data Involved: claims file of insurer

Keywords: privilege; responsiveness

View Case Opinion

Tsanacas v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 17-CV-00306 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2018).

Key Insight: Boilerplate objections were not enough to determine that requests were overly burdensome. Defendant needed to specify so court could determine.

Nature of Case: Privacy Rights, Stored Communications Act, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

Electronic Data Involved: Amazon Account

Keywords: burdensome, boilerplate objections

View Case Opinion

Par Pharm., Inc. v. Express Scripts Specialty Distribution Servs., Inc., No. 4:17MC510 RLW, 2018 WL 264840 (E.D. Mo. Jan. 2, 2018)

Key Insight: motion to compel production of documents including confidential patient information

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: database maintained by non-party

Keywords: undue burden and expense on a non-party, subpoena duces tecum

View Case Opinion

Hurd v. City of Lincoln, No. 4:16-CV-3029 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2017)

Key Insight: No produced emails were from the Mayor. Mayor’s deposition not necessary or proportional to needs of the case.

Nature of Case: employment discrimination and retaliation

Electronic Data Involved: Over 6,500 emails and attachments produced by defendant.

Keywords: Relevant and proportional, proportionality, mere conjecture and conclusory statements.

View Case Opinion

Klein v. Board of Trustees (D. Alaska, 2017)

Key Insight: ESI does not need to be produced if it is from sources not reasonably accessible on account of undue burden or cost.

Nature of Case: medical fees

Electronic Data Involved: medicare documents, etc

Keywords: undue burden, not reasonably accessible, third party requests

View Case Opinion

Holick v. Burkhart ( No. 16-1188-JTM (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2017), 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff did not specify whether any documents were being withheld in the course of making objections to discovery motions

Nature of Case: libel, assault, slander

Electronic Data Involved: documents and communications posted or stored on social media, e-mails

Keywords: “facially overbroad”, “anti-abortion”, “nearly two-decade time frame”, “provide any responsive information for the past seven (7) years”

View Case Opinion

Gottesman v. Santana, No. 16-cv-2902 JLS (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2017)

Key Insight: statute of limitations, proportionality

Nature of Case: copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: financial information

Keywords: meeting of the minds, statute of limitations, undue burden, amount in controversy

View Case Opinion

Marsteller v. Butterfield 8 Stamford LLC, et al. – 3:17-cv-01371 (District of Connecticut, 2017)

Key Insight: scope of discovery

Nature of Case: sexual harassment and retaliation under Title VII

Electronic Data Involved: authorization for medical records and access to social media accounts

Keywords: social media accounts, authorization for medical records, emotional distress

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.