Tag:Data Preservation

1
Saller v. QVC, Inc. (ED Pa., 2016)
2
Atiles v. Golub Corp., No. 521828 (State of New York Supreme Court, 2016)
3
In re Shawe & Elting LLC, No. C.A. 9661-CB (Delaware Chancery, 2016)
4
Martinez v. City of Chicago, No. 14-cv-369 (N.D. Ill. June 29, 2016).
5
Arbor, LLC v. Herrick, LLP (NY AppDiv, 2016)
6
Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, No. 7:07-cv-06304-KMK (S.D.N.Y. May 25, 2016).
7
Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2016).
8
Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).
9
McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)
10
InternMatch, Inc. v. Nxtbigthing, LLC (N.D. Cal., 2016)

Saller v. QVC, Inc. (ED Pa., 2016)

Key Insight: Discovery sanctions motion.

Nature of Case: Workplace discrimination.

Electronic Data Involved: Employment records including personnel files of supervisors and documents regarding performance of other employees.

Keywords: Failure to preserve, search terms, motion to compel.

View Case Opinion

Atiles v. Golub Corp., No. 521828 (State of New York Supreme Court, 2016)

Key Insight: If a party cannot show that destruction of video footage was intentional, then sanctions can be awarded unless it can be shown that the destroyed evidence would be relevant.

Nature of Case: grocery store slip and fall

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance camera footage

Keywords: video surveillance, spoliation, intentional destruction of evidence

View Case Opinion

In re Shawe & Elting LLC, No. C.A. 9661-CB (Delaware Chancery, 2016)

Key Insight: Sanctions for attorney’s fees are warranted when computer files are deleted (even if they are recovered) and when a phone is recklessly lost in a “palpably suspicious” incident.

Nature of Case: Corporate management disputes between co-founders

Electronic Data Involved: cell phone contents, computer files

Keywords: spoliation, palpably suspicious, lost phone, ineffective spoliation, reckless failure to preserve

View Case Opinion

Martinez v. City of Chicago, No. 14-cv-369 (N.D. Ill. June 29, 2016).

Key Insight: Plaintiff was arrested while police pursuing his brother. Videos from car were mis-labeled and therefore destroyed. Plaintiff could not show bad faith, so no adverse inference instruction.

Nature of Case: civil rights

Electronic Data Involved: Police Car Videos

Keywords: adverse inference; sanctions; bad faith

View Case Opinion

Arbor, LLC v. Herrick, LLP (NY AppDiv, 2016)

Key Insight: Sanctions for failure to preserve. Plaintiff did not issue a litigation hold until 23 months after reasonable anticipation of litigation.

Nature of Case: Legal malpractice

Electronic Data Involved: ESI destroyed under plaintiff’s record destruction policies: Backup tapes, routine deletion of emails, erasure of hard drives/email accounts.

Keywords: Preservation, spoliation sanctions, adverse inference charge, litigation hold.

Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, No. 7:07-cv-06304-KMK (S.D.N.Y. May 25, 2016).

Key Insight: The Village did not preserve the facebook posts or text messages despite having that duty. Court ruled that severe sanctions were warranted including an adverse inference and legal fees.

Nature of Case: discrimination; zoning

Electronic Data Involved: Facebook posts and text messages

Keywords: adverse inference; facebook, texts

View Case Opinion

Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, No. 13-cv-04236-BLF (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2016).

Key Insight: Plaintiff threatened legal action, but failed to have it’s vendor stop automatic deletion and did not preserve recrods when email system changed. Defendant was prejudiced by this spoilation. Court allowed witnesses to testify to spoilation and potential contents of those communications.

Nature of Case: incentive programs and Robinson-Patman Act violations

Electronic Data Involved: internal and external communications

Keywords: spoilation; vendor

View Case Opinion

Coale v. Metro-North Railroad Co., No. 08-cv-01307 (D.Conn. Apr. 11, 2016).

Key Insight: Court concluded defendant had duty to preserve oily substance and was negligent in doing so. Permissive adverse inference instruction granted.

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: oily substance plaintiff slipped on

Keywords: adverse inference;

View Case Opinion

McIntosh v. USA (SDNY, 2016)

Key Insight: Plaintiff unsuccessfully seeks injunction to prevent destruction of certain evidence. Defendants argued that sanctions would be inappropriate and no spoliation had occurred.

Nature of Case: Inmate pro se plaintiff asserts a host of constitutional violations against the U.S. and individual prison personnel.

Electronic Data Involved: Deleted video footage.

Keywords: Failure to preserve, destruction of evidence, spoliation, adverse inference.

View Case Opinion

InternMatch, Inc. v. Nxtbigthing, LLC (N.D. Cal., 2016)

Key Insight: Failure to preserve relevant evidence.

Nature of Case: Trademark ownership dispute.

Electronic Data Involved: Defendants discarded computers, following an alleged power surge which “fried” data.

Keywords: Defendants “willfully spoliated evidence” and the “extraordinary measures Batterman undertook to mislead opposing counsel and the Court merit a finding of bad faith.”

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.