Electronic Discovery Law

Legal issues, news and best practices relating to the discovery of electronically stored information.

1
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Federal Circuit, 2018)
2
Hernandez v. Tulare County Correction Center, No. 16-CV-00413 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2018)
3
Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)
4
ML Healthcare Services v. Publix Super Markets (11th Cir., 2018)
5
Gipson v. Management & Training Corp., No. 16-CV-624, 2018 WL 736265 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 6, 2018).
6
Benedict v. Hankook Tire (E.D. Va., 2018)
7
Kische v. Simsek (Western District of Washington, 2018)
8
Waymo LLC v. Uber Techs., Inc., No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)
9
TLS Management & Marketing Services, LLC v. Mardis Financial Services, Inc., et al. – 3:14-cv-00881 (Southern District of Mississippi, 2018)
10
Brown v. Sam?s West Inc. (Nevada District, 2018)

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Federal Circuit, 2018)

Key Insight: if the district court erred in going forward with trial even though all samples were not produced in discovery

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: samples of proposed infringing product

Keywords: production of materials, motion to compel production, sufficient evidence

View Case Opinion

Hernandez v. Tulare County Correction Center, No. 16-CV-00413 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2018)

Key Insight: spoliation sanctions

Nature of Case: ? 1983 civil rights action

Electronic Data Involved: videos, photographs

Keywords: spoliation, intent to deprive, 37(e)(2),negligence, prejudice 37(e)(1), duty to preserve

View Case Opinion

Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)

Key Insight: Private messages between individuals that are not defendants are protected from discovery through the Stored Communications Act even if the providing company itself is the named defendant

Nature of Case: Class action securities fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic messages (twitter direct messages)

Keywords: Class action, direct message, twitter, stock

View Case Opinion

ML Healthcare Services v. Publix Super Markets (11th Cir., 2018)

Key Insight: whether non-movant acted in bad faith or with the intent to deprive

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance video

Keywords: Eleventh Circuit, crucial, bad faith, usual course of business, broad and far-reaching request

View Case Opinion

Gipson v. Management & Training Corp., No. 16-CV-624, 2018 WL 736265 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 6, 2018).

Key Insight: Motion (denied) for adverse inference based on alleged spoliation.

Nature of Case: 8th Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C. s. 1983

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance video

Keywords: inherent power, adverse-inference instruction

View Case Opinion

Benedict v. Hankook Tire (E.D. Va., 2018)

Key Insight: Rule 37(e) governs, an expert may not opine on what a party may/may not or should/should not have done

Nature of Case: Products liability

Electronic Data Involved: business documents

Keywords: Expert, 37(e), spoliation sanctions

View Case Opinion

Kische v. Simsek (Western District of Washington, 2018)

Key Insight: Courts have inherent authority and FRCP 37 to apply sanctions for spoliation and the inherent authority analysis (which the court used in this case) is much the same as FRCP 37

Nature of Case: Trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data generally (EDI records, Quickbook files, passwords, sales data)

Keywords: Turkey, women’s apparel, Lanham act

Identified Local Court Rule(s): W.D. Wash. LCR 7

View Case Opinion

Waymo LLC v. Uber Techs., Inc., No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)

Key Insight: Intent must be proved for adverse inference sanction, “evilness” of corporation not at issue

Nature of Case: Trade secret misappropriation

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic records

Keywords: Uber, evil corporation, trade secret, imagination, spoliation, Academy Award

View Case Opinion

TLS Management & Marketing Services, LLC v. Mardis Financial Services, Inc., et al. – 3:14-cv-00881 (Southern District of Mississippi, 2018)

Key Insight: was data not preserved and therefore lost in bad faith?

Nature of Case: breach of contract, tortious business interference, unfair competition, trade secrets law, etc

Electronic Data Involved: Business documents, information about business strategy, clients and products.

Keywords: preservation, bad faith, destroyed data.

View Case Opinion

Brown v. Sam?s West Inc. (Nevada District, 2018)

Key Insight: Adverse inference instruct sanction correct because party failed to preserve video evidence when overhauling system

Nature of Case: sip and fall, premises liability

Electronic Data Involved: video

Keywords: adverse inference instructions, culpable state of mind, destroying video

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.