Electronic Discovery Law

Legal issues, news and best practices relating to the discovery of electronically stored information.

1
In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation, No. 16 C 8637 (N.D. Ill. July 26, 2018)
2
Merriweather v. United Parcel Services, No. 3:17-CV-349-CRS-LLK (W.D. Ky. July 25, 2018)
3
Leveraging Machine Translation Technology for Multi-Lingual Arbitrations
4
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Tri-State Zoological Park of W. Md (Maryland District, 2018)
5
Tanner v. BD LaPlace, LLC, No. 2:17-cv-05141-MLCF-MBN (E.D. La. July 23, 2018)
6
BlackRock Balanced Capital Portfolio v. Deutsche Bank National Tr. Co. (S.D.N.Y., 2018)
7
Shannon v. Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies, LLC, No. 14-CV-00787 (W.D. Mo. July 20, 2018)
8
Satmodo, LLC v. Whenever Communications, LLC, 3:17-cv-192-AJB-NLS (S.D. Cal. July 20, 2018)
9
AbbVie Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH (D. Del., 2018)
10
Bradley v. County of San Joaquin (No. 17-cv-02313 (E.D. Cal. July 13, 2018), 2018)

In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation, No. 16 C 8637 (N.D. Ill. July 26, 2018)

Key Insight: Undue burden or cost of discovery alleged by defendant.

Nature of Case: antitrust class action

Electronic Data Involved: ESI searches upon 12 custodians

Keywords: Has not made a threshold showing, does not satisfy the rule 26(b)(2)(C) factors.

View Case Opinion

Merriweather v. United Parcel Services, No. 3:17-CV-349-CRS-LLK (W.D. Ky. July 25, 2018)

Key Insight: Due Diligence in searching for requested records and confirming non-existence was sufficient by Defendant to meet Plaintiff’s discovery request; perfect preservation was not required

Nature of Case: Negligence-car accident

Electronic Data Involved: Daily Driving Reports

Keywords: Preservation; Spoilation; Due Diligence

View Case Opinion

Leveraging Machine Translation Technology for Multi-Lingual Arbitrations

Arbitration matters, and the teams working on them, can often span geographic borders which in turn can present a number of logistical issues.  These range from the mundane, such as standard paper/binder sizes, to schedule challenges presented by participants residing in multiple time zones, to what can be the biggest logistical challenge of all: language barriers.

While machine translation technology will not replace the need for certified translations of documents to be used in legal proceedings, it can be a valuable addition to your arsenal. This technology is a practical tool to help streamline the review of documents, reduce costs for clients, and optimize your staffing for international projects.

In the July 2018 edition of K&L Gates Arbitration World, we discuss the benefits, costs, and challenges associated with utilizing machine translation technology. Read the full article here.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Tri-State Zoological Park of W. Md (Maryland District, 2018)

Key Insight: Parties cannot use the parts of allegedly work product matter helpful to their case and withhold the rest

Nature of Case: Endangered species act enforcement

Electronic Data Involved: audio, video, photos

Keywords: attorney work product, fact work product,

View Case Opinion

Tanner v. BD LaPlace, LLC, No. 2:17-cv-05141-MLCF-MBN (E.D. La. July 23, 2018)

Key Insight: Whether discovery of requested records is relevant and proportional, whether privilege as regards medical records is waived when a plaintiff puts his/her medical condition at issue

Nature of Case: ADA disability discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: medical and financial records

Keywords: relevant, proportional, ADA, privilege, admissibility, mental condition

View Case Opinion

Shannon v. Honeywell Federal Manufacturing and Technologies, LLC, No. 14-CV-00787 (W.D. Mo. July 20, 2018)

Key Insight: search terms, proportionality

Nature of Case: employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: electronic records

Keywords: search terms, boolean connectors

View Case Opinion

Bradley v. County of San Joaquin (No. 17-cv-02313 (E.D. Cal. July 13, 2018), 2018)

Key Insight: whether plaintiffs had met their burden to show that adequate meet and confer discussions took place prior to filing their motion to compel.

Nature of Case: 1983 Civil Rights Act claim

Electronic Data Involved: unspecified ESI

Keywords: “The burden of ensuring that proper meet and confer discussions take place is on the moving party”, plaintiffs did not make the necessary efforts to meet and confer”, “Plaintiffs were plainly deficient in their efforts”

Identified Local Court Rule(s): E.D. Cal. R. 251(b)

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.