Electronic Discovery Law

Legal issues, news and best practices relating to the discovery of electronically stored information.

1
Finjan, Inc. v. Zscaler, Inc. (N.D. California, 2019)
2
Barker v. Insight Glob., LLC, No. 16-cv-07186-BLF (VKD) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2019).
3
DR Distrib., LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (N.D. Ill., 2019)
4
Stovall v. Brykan Legends, LLC (D. KS, 2019)
5
Hunters Run Gun Club v. Baker, No. 3:17-cv-00176 (M.D. La, 2019)
6
Locke v. Swift Transportation Co. (W.D. Ky., 2019)
7
Gabiola et al v. Keesee et al (N.D. Ill., 2019)
8
Ennis-Flint, Inc. v. Greer No. 18-CVS-3612, 2019 NCBC 11 (N.C. Business Court Feb. 4, 2019)
9
RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)
10
Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. 17-cv-04405 (N.D. Cal., 2019)

Finjan, Inc. v. Zscaler, Inc. (N.D. California, 2019)

Key Insight: European privacy requirements preclude the production of personal data but a foreign country’s statute does nto deprive an American court the power to order production .

Nature of Case: Patent Infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Emails from a single individual

Keywords: international privacy statute, personal data,

View Case Opinion

Barker v. Insight Glob., LLC, No. 16-cv-07186-BLF (VKD) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2019).

Key Insight: Parties did not explicitly discuss format of production. Court directed parties to meet and confer.

Nature of Case: Compensation and non-solicitation pacts

Electronic Data Involved: Production Format

Keywords: Format of production, native files

View Case Opinion

DR Distrib., LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (N.D. Ill., 2019)

Key Insight: Plaintiffs object to dismissal of a counterclaim against them because Defendant’s desire to dismiss the claim is related to loss of relevant ESI

Nature of Case: defamation, trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail, instant messages

Keywords: counterclaim, motion to amend, diligent, dismissal

View Case Opinion

Stovall v. Brykan Legends, LLC (D. KS, 2019)

Key Insight: video surveillance showing incident on which part of complaint is based could not be found by D, P motions for sanction for spoliation of evidence.

Nature of Case: employment discrimination, sexual harassment, workers compensation

Electronic Data Involved: Video surveillance

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, preservation, surveillance, harassment, employment discrimination, bad faith

View Case Opinion

Hunters Run Gun Club v. Baker, No. 3:17-cv-00176 (M.D. La, 2019)

Key Insight: The refusal to provide written authorization allowing a service provider to release text message records constitutes “possession, custody, or control” of those text messages.

Nature of Case: lease termination by law enforcement

Electronic Data Involved: text messages

Keywords: release of records, written authorization

View Case Opinion

RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., et al. v. Hospital Partners, Inc., et al. (W.D. MO, 2019)

Key Insight: objections to requests for production, overly broad requests, overly broad objections, merit-less objections

Nature of Case: Hospital Fraud, laboratory tests billing scheme, insurance fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Billing data, invoices, financial records

Keywords: fifth amendment, overly broad, unduly burdensome, preservation efforts, retention notice, objection specificity

View Case Opinion

Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. 17-cv-04405 (N.D. Cal., 2019)

Key Insight: It is common practice to prohibit redactions for relevance for the protection of non-parties when there is a stipulated protective order to designate sensitive documents as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: documents with relevance redactions applied by a third party

Keywords: third party redaction, protective order, relevance

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.