Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Lindsey v. Butterfield Health Care II, Inc (Ill. App. , 2017)
2
Charles v. City of New York (E.D. N.Y., 2017)
3
Davine v. Golub Corp. (Massachusetts District, 2017)
4
Simon v. Northwestern Univ., No. 1:150CV01433, 2017 WL 467677 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 2017)
5
Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Assoc. v. California Dept. of Education (Eastern District of California, 2017)
6
Despite Failure to Employ “Best Practices,” Lack of Sufficient Prejudice Results in Lesser Sanctions
7
HCC Ins. Holdings v. Flowers, No. 1:15-cv-3262-WSD (N.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017).
8
Patrick v. Tractor Supply, Co., No. 16-10755, 2017 WL 396301 (E.D. La. Jan. 30, 2017)
9
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v. Merus (Fed. Cir., 2017)
10
Vir2us, Inc. v. Invincea, Inc. (E.D. Va., 2017)

Charles v. City of New York (E.D. N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: Court ruled that it could not be inferred from mere negligence that the recording would be favorable to defendants. Other sources of information/discovery were available as well. An application of Rule 37(e) would make no difference (the rule was not cited).

Nature of Case: Civil rights

Electronic Data Involved: Deleted cell phone video

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Davine v. Golub Corp. (Massachusetts District, 2017)

Key Insight: Predictive coding models are legitimate, and document review can stop when the burden outweighs the benefits.

Nature of Case: wage and hour class action

Electronic Data Involved: archived email

Keywords: privilege log, predictive coding,

View Case Opinion

Simon v. Northwestern Univ., No. 1:150CV01433, 2017 WL 467677 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 3, 2017)

Key Insight: Compelling ESI prematurely is not needed if the records will be preserved throughout litigation

Nature of Case: malicious prosecution

Electronic Data Involved: emails, documents

Keywords: Scope of ESI search terms, willingness to produce

View Case Opinion

Despite Failure to Employ “Best Practices,” Lack of Sufficient Prejudice Results in Lesser Sanctions

F.T.C. v. DirecTV, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-01129-HSG (MEJ), 2016 WL 7386133 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2016)

In this case, the Court addressed Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e)(1) but, despite acknowledging that Defendant “could have been more forthcoming in its disclosures to the FTC, and/or more proactive in its preservation efforts,” declined to grant the request to exclude evidence, including Defendant’s expert’s report, absent a showing  of sufficient prejudice.  Instead, the Court ordered Defendant to make its expert available for a 4-hour deposition, should Plaintiff find it useful.

Read More

HCC Ins. Holdings v. Flowers, No. 1:15-cv-3262-WSD (N.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017).

Key Insight: Spoliation,

Nature of Case: Trade Secrets

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail accounts, electronic evidence, electronic storage devices, personal and work computers, cloud storage accounts

Keywords: Spoliation, Hot Sheets,

View Case Opinion

Patrick v. Tractor Supply, Co., No. 16-10755, 2017 WL 396301 (E.D. La. Jan. 30, 2017)

Key Insight: Trial court exercises discretion to impose sanctions (no Rule 37(e) used), no bad faith found when requesting footage of the incident where footage surrounding the incident was deleted due to normal retention policies (negligence at best)

Nature of Case: Personal injury (slip and fall)

Electronic Data Involved: Store video footage

Keywords: slip and fall, constructive notice, cable wire, summary judgment

View Case Opinion

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v. Merus (Fed. Cir., 2017)

Key Insight: The court inferred from plaintiff’s improper discovery conduct, hiding documents, privilege problems, etc, into the main case as evidence that the plaintiffs were untrustworthy.

Nature of Case: Patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Multiple types of scientific documents, charts, business papers, etc.

Keywords: Spoliation, privilege log, uncooperative discovery, inequitable conduct, litigation misconduct

View Case Opinion

Vir2us, Inc. v. Invincea, Inc. (E.D. Va., 2017)

Key Insight: inadequate search and production, misrepresentation, failure to supplement, follow-up, failure to disclose

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: email, board meeting minutes, investor presentations

Keywords: monetary sanctions, needless burden, late disclosures, post-settlement order, misrepresentation, motion to show cause

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.