Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverages Commission, et al., No. 15-00134 (W.D. Texas, Apr. 10, 2017)
2
Williams v. Angies List (S.D. Ind., 2017)
3
Court Concludes Rule 37(e) Does Not Apply to “situations where, as here, a party intentionally deleted the recording”
4
Duffy v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (D. Kansas , 2017)
5
Hsueh v. New York State Dep?t of Fin. Servs (Southern District of New York, 2017)
6
Hsueh v. New York State, No. 15 cv 3401 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2017)
7
Inderjeet Basra v. Ecklund Logistics (D.Neb, 2017)
8
Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank (E.D. Cal., 2017)
9
Agility Public Whsg. v. DOD (D. D.C., 2017)
10
Baxter International, Inc. v. AXA Versicherung, 1:11-cv-09131 (N.D. Ill.) (Illionis Northern District, 2017)

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverages Commission, et al., No. 15-00134 (W.D. Texas, Apr. 10, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff objected to discovery requests and added that it was withholding documents pursuant to this objection . Judge suggested a clearer response would have been preferred, but denied motion to compel.

Nature of Case: State Statute Constitutionality

Electronic Data Involved: ESI – Communications and Documents

Keywords: Objection; Withhold

View Case Opinion

Court Concludes Rule 37(e) Does Not Apply to “situations where, as here, a party intentionally deleted the recording”

Hsueh v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Fin. Servs., No. 15 Civ. 3401 (PAC), 2017 WL 1194706 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2017)

In this case arising from claims of sexual harassment at work, the court found that an adverse inference was the appropriate remedy for Plaintiff’s deletion of a recorded conversation with an HR representative. In the course of its analysis, the court agreed with Defendants that “Rule 37(e) applies only to situations where ‘a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve’ ESI; not to situations where, as here, a party intentionally deleted the recording” and thus relied upon inherent authority to impose sanctions.

Read More

Duffy v. Lawrence Memorial Hospital (D. Kansas , 2017)

Key Insight: whether production of a random sample is appropriate when full review unduly burdensome

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: patient records

Keywords: random sample, undue burden, statistical sample, prejudice, TAR

View Case Opinion

Hsueh v. New York State Dep?t of Fin. Servs (Southern District of New York, 2017)

Key Insight: Intentionally deleting ESI is different from failing to preserve and falls under a court’s inherent authority, not FRCP 37(e).

Nature of Case: Sexual harassment

Electronic Data Involved: Recorded conversation

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions, recording, DFS, department of financial services

View Case Opinion

Hsueh v. New York State, No. 15 cv 3401 (S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2017)

Key Insight: Court said 37(e) doesn’t apply when recording was intentionally deleted. Adverse inference granted for plaintiff’s deletion of an audio tape, despite its subsequent recovery and production from a hard drive backup.

Nature of Case: sexual harassment at work

Electronic Data Involved: audio tape, hard drive backup

Keywords: adverse inference, over-preservation concerns

Inderjeet Basra v. Ecklund Logistics (D.Neb, 2017)

Key Insight: no intentional destruction of evidence, mere negligence in not maintaining record of accidents in Qualcomm/PeopleNet

Nature of Case: negligence, loss of consortium, punitive damages

Electronic Data Involved: Qualcomm data, PeopleNet server data

Keywords: Spoliation

View Case Opinion

Bird v. Wells Fargo Bank (E.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: Conduct discovery in good faith; Maintain a civil tone in communications; Purge of emails

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: ESI; email; SMS; Text messages

Keywords: Good Faith; Proportionality; Meet and confer; Rule 16 – Scope of discovery; Purge of emails; Complete breakdown of discovery

View Case Opinion

Agility Public Whsg. v. DOD (D. D.C., 2017)

Key Insight: 37(e) takes precedence over inherent authority in cases where it can be applied. Spoliation took place before there was anticipation of a trial.

Nature of Case: Defamation, tortious interference with contracts

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails

Keywords: Spoliation, inherent authority, 37(e)

View Case Opinion

Baxter International, Inc. v. AXA Versicherung, 1:11-cv-09131 (N.D. Ill.) (Illionis Northern District, 2017)

Key Insight: plaintiff is seeking notices of litigation sent to co-insurers by defendant and defendant claims work product and privilege.

Nature of Case: MDL against drug companies for damages for allegedly contaminated blood products.

Electronic Data Involved: post-litigation communications with co-insurers and re-insurers.

Keywords: work product, privilege, notice to insurers, scope of coverage

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.