Catagory:Case Summaries

1
In re Pickrell (Tex. App. 10th Dist. , 2017)
2
US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)
3
Garcia v. City of Santa Clara (Northern District of California, 2017)
4
Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)
5
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger (U. S. Supreme Court, 2017)
6
Rockwell Medical, Inc. v. Richmond Brothers, Inc. (E.D. Mich., 2017)
7
Tchatat v. OHara (Southern District of NY, 2017)
8
Meredith v. United Collection Bureau, Inc., No. 1:16 CV 1102, 2017 WL 1355696 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 13, 2017)
9
Scott v. Eglin Fed. Credit Union (N.D. Fla., 2017)
10
Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)

US ex rel Scutellaro v. Capitol Supply (D.D.C., 2017)

Key Insight: Whether FRCP 37(e) applies where the duty to preserve does not arise out of the anticipation or conduct of litigation, whether sanctions issued under a court’s inherent power were appropriate

Nature of Case: False Claims Act

Electronic Data Involved: country of origin data

Keywords: Country of Origin documentation, adverse inference, Trade Agreements Act, inherent power, overwrite, direct proof or disproof

View Case Opinion

Garcia v. City of Santa Clara (Northern District of California, 2017)

Key Insight: Sanction and adverse inference inappropriate because nothing lost/destroyed was highly probative

Nature of Case: Excessive force

Electronic Data Involved: emails, reports

Keywords: adverse inference

View Case Opinion

Elhannon LLC v. F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co., No. 2:14-cv-262 (D. Vt. Apr. 18, 2017)

Key Insight: Defendant has inadequate production even when supplemented. Judge ordered meet-and-confer to work out some of the disagreements. Judge did not give either side sanctions.

Nature of Case: Breach of Contract; Consumer Fraud

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail; Electronic Database

Keywords: Meet-and-confer; Inadequate Production; Supplemental Production

View Case Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger (U. S. Supreme Court, 2017)

Key Insight: Slow responses to discovery; withholding information; Discovery fraud

Nature of Case: Personal Injury

Electronic Data Involved: Not specifically stated “documents”

Keywords: Attorney Fees; Bad Faith; Withholding information; Misconduct; Sanctions must be compensatory not punitive; Court’s inherent authority; But-For test

View Case Opinion

Rockwell Medical, Inc. v. Richmond Brothers, Inc. (E.D. Mich., 2017)

Key Insight: Can discovery be given an expedited time table in order to precede a preliminary injunction hearing? Is it proportional?

Nature of Case: Legislation on violations of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934

Electronic Data Involved: Depositions and documents (defined very broadly)

Keywords: Preliminary injunction, expedited discovery, proportionality, unduly burdensome

View Case Opinion

Tchatat v. OHara (Southern District of NY, 2017)

Key Insight: Arrest did not trigger a duty for defendants to preserve video of alleged beating before arrest

Nature of Case: Wrongful arrest

Electronic Data Involved: video, electronic photos

Keywords: triggering duty to preserve

View Case Opinion

Meredith v. United Collection Bureau, Inc., No. 1:16 CV 1102, 2017 WL 1355696 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 13, 2017)

Key Insight: A program to parse relevant data from an existing database may trump usual course of business format

Nature of Case: Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic list of wrong phone calls

Keywords: computer program, usual course of business,

View Case Opinion

Scott v. Eglin Fed. Credit Union (N.D. Fla., 2017)

Key Insight: Discovery of these things was blocked, since they were ruled to be only marginally relevant compared to the time and expense it would take to produce them.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: emails and text messages

Keywords: relevance, marginal relevance, time and expense

View Case Opinion

Zamora v. Stellar Management Group, Inc. (W.D. Mo., 2017)

Key Insight: Can the court order additional discovery if a party destroys evidence? Is a prejudice ruling required in a destruction of evidence case?

Nature of Case: Retaliation and discharge

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, emails, social media messages

Keywords: Prejudice, Destruction of evidence, Social media, Text messages

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.