Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Innovacon, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00698-CAB-NLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2018)
2
Rhoda v. Rhoda (S.D.N.Y., 2017)
3
Catrinar v. Wynnestone Communities Corp., et al., No. 14-11872 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2017)
4
Title Capital Mgt. v. Progress Residential (S.D. Fla., 2017)
5
Archer v. York City School Dist. (3rd Cir., 2017)
6
Carpenter v. Gregg Scott (C.D. Ill., 2017)
7
The William Powell Co. v. National Indemnity Co. (S.D. Ohio, 2017)
8
Moody v. CSX Transportation (W.D.N.Y. , 2017)
9
Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC, No. 17-cv-00808-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Sept. 20, 2017)
10
United States v. New Mexico State University (D. N.M., 2017)

Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Innovacon, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-00698-CAB-NLS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2018)

Key Insight: demand for irrelevant and disproportionate evidence

Nature of Case: breach of patent agreement

Electronic Data Involved: 300 GB emails

Keywords: irrelevant, patent infringement, reasonable limits on discovery

View Case Opinion

Rhoda v. Rhoda (S.D.N.Y., 2017)

Key Insight: which version of FRCP 37(e) should be applied where the issue was raised before the new version became effected but the motion was filed, whether after its effective date?

Nature of Case: employment

Electronic Data Involved: email

Keywords: adverse instruction, intent to deprive, duty to preserve, culpability, web hosting, relevance, prejudice

View Case Opinion

Catrinar v. Wynnestone Communities Corp., et al., No. 14-11872 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff produced two versions of email (both dated before filing). Defendant argued one was fake and an attempt to bolster Plaintiff’s claim. Court deemed that dismissal was too harsh a sanction and denied dismissal sanction request.

Nature of Case: Family Medical Leave Act Violations

Electronic Data Involved: E-Mails

Keywords: Duplicate E-mail; Dismissal Sanction

View Case Opinion

Title Capital Mgt. v. Progress Residential (S.D. Fla., 2017)

Key Insight: The onset of the duty under Rule 37(e) does not have to say which exact kind of litigation that will occur. Prejudice was not found, but the question of intent was pushed to later.

Nature of Case: Contract, copyright

Electronic Data Involved: records, documents, and logs of the company

Keywords: Spoliation, intent to deprive, sanctions, prejudice

View Case Opinion

Archer v. York City School Dist. (3rd Cir., 2017)

Key Insight: Was the email account in question deleted with prejudice? Court found no prejudice, standard practice of deletion plus deletion was done a year before notice of legislation. Opinion however does not cite Rule 37(e)

Nature of Case: School charter renewal dispute/constitutional

Electronic Data Involved: Email account

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions

View Case Opinion

Carpenter v. Gregg Scott (C.D. Ill., 2017)

Key Insight: Court analyzed sanction request without determining if the footage was ESI, and without citing37(e). Court states that no spoliation occurred because there is no bad faith or notice of imminent legislation.

Nature of Case: 1983 legislation

Electronic Data Involved: Prison video surveillance

Keywords: spoliation, video,

View Case Opinion

The William Powell Co. v. National Indemnity Co. (S.D. Ohio, 2017)

Key Insight: To what extent does disclosure of privileged documents to third parties waive privilege?

Nature of Case: Litigation for bad faith (Ohio law)

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, deskfiles, and relevant shared e-documents

Keywords: Accidental waiver, third party disclosure, protected relationships

View Case Opinion

Moody v. CSX Transportation (W.D.N.Y. , 2017)

Key Insight: failure to take reasonable steps to preserve data, prejudice to other party, intent to deprive

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: event recorder data: .dat file

Keywords: reasonable steps, adverse inference, relevance of data, event recorder, black box, laptop crash, prejudice, inferred intent to deprive

View Case Opinion

Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC, No. 17-cv-00808-WJM-NYW (D. Colo. Sept. 20, 2017)

Key Insight: Plaintiff had kept a journal which was scanned and provided. Original Hard Copy was then destroyed. Judge granted motion for additional deposition time, but denied adverse inference instruction.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination; Wrongful Termination

Electronic Data Involved: Hard Copy of Scanned Journal

Keywords: Sanctions, Adverse Inference, Scanned Copy, Hard Copy

View Case Opinion

United States v. New Mexico State University (D. N.M., 2017)

Key Insight: Should deficient search terms be supplemented using court appointed terms? And how closely should counsel work together on electronic searches?

Nature of Case: Workplace discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails, documents of complaints and communication about complaints

Keywords: Keywords, Cooperation,

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.