Catagory:Case Summaries

1
American Honda v. Thygesen (S.Ct. Okla., 2018)
2
Kelly Forman v. Mark Henkin (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
3
Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Techs., LLC, et al., No. 4:17-CV-00450 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2018)
4
Spencer v. Lunada Bad Boys, 2018 WL 839862, No. 16-cv-02129-SJO-RAO (C.D. Cal., 2018)
5
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Federal Circuit, 2018)
6
Hernandez v. Tulare County Correction Center, No. 16-CV-00413 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2018)
7
ML Healthcare Services v. Publix Super Markets (11th Cir., 2018)
8
Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)
9
Benedict v. Hankook Tire (E.D. Va., 2018)
10
Gipson v. Management & Training Corp., No. 16-CV-624, 2018 WL 736265 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 6, 2018).

American Honda v. Thygesen (S.Ct. Okla., 2018)

Key Insight: Safe harbor, since it was destroyed long before the suit was filed or foreseeable

Nature of Case: Products liability

Electronic Data Involved: ESI design information

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions

Identified State Rule(s): 12 O.S. 2011 ? 3237(G)

Kelly Forman v. Mark Henkin (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)

Key Insight: Privacy settings do not govern scope of disclosure of social media materials

Nature of Case: Personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: Facebook posts

Keywords: Facebook, privacy setting, horse, social media

Identified State Rule(s): CPLR 3101, CPLR 3103

View Case Opinion

Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Techs., LLC, et al., No. 4:17-CV-00450 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2018)

Key Insight: Broad requests by Plaintiff were narrowed by conference and court decision to time period during and after Defendant’s employment

Nature of Case: Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Confidential Information

Electronic Data Involved: E-mails and Documents

Keywords: proportionality, relevancy, time-limited

View Case Opinion

Spencer v. Lunada Bad Boys, 2018 WL 839862, No. 16-cv-02129-SJO-RAO (C.D. Cal., 2018)

Key Insight: 4 deleted messages were lost, as they could not be recovered from other defendants

Nature of Case: right to surf free from harassment

Electronic Data Involved: text messages

Keywords: spoliation, duty to preserve

View Case Opinion

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Federal Circuit, 2018)

Key Insight: if the district court erred in going forward with trial even though all samples were not produced in discovery

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: samples of proposed infringing product

Keywords: production of materials, motion to compel production, sufficient evidence

View Case Opinion

Hernandez v. Tulare County Correction Center, No. 16-CV-00413 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2018)

Key Insight: spoliation sanctions

Nature of Case: ? 1983 civil rights action

Electronic Data Involved: videos, photographs

Keywords: spoliation, intent to deprive, 37(e)(2),negligence, prejudice 37(e)(1), duty to preserve

View Case Opinion

ML Healthcare Services v. Publix Super Markets (11th Cir., 2018)

Key Insight: whether non-movant acted in bad faith or with the intent to deprive

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance video

Keywords: Eleventh Circuit, crucial, bad faith, usual course of business, broad and far-reaching request

View Case Opinion

Shenwick v. Twitter Inc., No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2018)

Key Insight: Private messages between individuals that are not defendants are protected from discovery through the Stored Communications Act even if the providing company itself is the named defendant

Nature of Case: Class action securities fraud

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic messages (twitter direct messages)

Keywords: Class action, direct message, twitter, stock

View Case Opinion

Benedict v. Hankook Tire (E.D. Va., 2018)

Key Insight: Rule 37(e) governs, an expert may not opine on what a party may/may not or should/should not have done

Nature of Case: Products liability

Electronic Data Involved: business documents

Keywords: Expert, 37(e), spoliation sanctions

View Case Opinion

Gipson v. Management & Training Corp., No. 16-CV-624, 2018 WL 736265 (S.D. Miss. Feb. 6, 2018).

Key Insight: Motion (denied) for adverse inference based on alleged spoliation.

Nature of Case: 8th Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C. s. 1983

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance video

Keywords: inherent power, adverse-inference instruction

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.