Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Nunes v. Rushton, No. 2:14-cv-00627-JNP (D. Utah May 14, 2018)
2
Elliott-Thomas v. Smith, 154 Ohio St.3d 11, 2018-Ohio-1783 (2018).
3
Delago v. Tarabochia (No. C17-1822RSL (W.D. Wash. May 4, 2018), 2018)
4
In re Modern Plastics Corp (U.S. Ct. App. Sixth Cir., 2018)
5
Brewer v. BNSF (D. Mont., 2018)
6
Steves and Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc. (Eastern District of Virginia, 2018)
7
Mitchell v. Capitol Records, LLC, No. 3:15-CV-00174-JHM (W.D. Ky. Apr. 30, 2018).
8
Brown v. Wal-Mart Store (Northern District California, San Jose Division, 2018)
9
Heggen v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00440-TLS-SLC (N.D. Ind. April 27, 2018)
10
In re Morning Song Bird Food Litigation (S.D. Ind., 2018)

Nunes v. Rushton, No. 2:14-cv-00627-JNP (D. Utah May 14, 2018)

Key Insight: Intentional deletion of accounts does not lead to prejudice if the data is still accessible, but does lead to an adverse inference when the data is not

Nature of Case: Copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: “sock puppet” accounts and related data

Keywords: Sock puppet accounts, adverse inference, spoliation sanctions

View Case Opinion

Delago v. Tarabochia (No. C17-1822RSL (W.D. Wash. May 4, 2018), 2018)

Key Insight: whether certain ESI production requests relating to ESI created both before and after a personal injury incident are proportional to the needs of the case

Nature of Case: personal injury, Jones Act

Electronic Data Involved: text messages, call logs, roaming data logs, phone account information, credit card transaction history, bank account transaction history

Keywords: “defendants are fishing”, ” balance of the benefits and burdens of these post-incident discovery requests are not in defendants’ favor”, “wheelhouse”

View Case Opinion

In re Modern Plastics Corp (U.S. Ct. App. Sixth Cir., 2018)

Key Insight: Attorney’s fees for unduly burdensome third party subpoenas are compensated

Nature of Case: Trusts and estates

Electronic Data Involved: Emails

Keywords: third party, subpoena, attorney’s fees, reimbursement, cost shifting

View Case Opinion

Brewer v. BNSF (D. Mont., 2018)

Key Insight: A ruling of prejudice requires specificity as to documents. Intent is required for 37(3) sanctions, but courts can reserve the right to impose a lesser sanction after seeing hope evidence is presented at trial.

Nature of Case: Employment dispute

Electronic Data Involved: e-mails

Keywords: Spoliation sanctions, prejudice, specificity

View Case Opinion

Steves and Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc. (Eastern District of Virginia, 2018)

Key Insight: Spoliation sanctions must remedy the harm caused by the loss, and if documents are produced there is little loss

Nature of Case: Intellectual Property (Trade secrets)

Electronic Data Involved: E-mail

Keywords: Spoliation, sanctions

View Case Opinion

Mitchell v. Capitol Records, LLC, No. 3:15-CV-00174-JHM (W.D. Ky. Apr. 30, 2018).

Key Insight: Boilerplate objections did not allow court to determine and defendants ordered to produce all documents withheld on basis of boilerplate objections.

Nature of Case: Copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Financial Records, Responses to Questions

Keywords: boilerplate objections

View Case Opinion

Brown v. Wal-Mart Store (Northern District California, San Jose Division, 2018)

Key Insight: A party’s late disclosure of evidence (while using it as the basis of their own expert opinion) justifies exclusion of that evidence

Nature of Case: Certified class action

Electronic Data Involved: audiovisual recordings, data logs

Keywords: late disclosure, exclusion sanctions, expert discovery cutoff, fact discovery, untimeliness

View Case Opinion

Heggen v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00440-TLS-SLC (N.D. Ind. April 27, 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff performed “factory reset” on phone, deleting videos; Plaintiff had sent to EEOC, but could not produce e-mail; Was not enough for sanction of dismissal

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Cell Phone Video

Keywords: Negligent Spoilation; Perjury; Sanctions

View Case Opinion

In re Morning Song Bird Food Litigation (S.D. Ind., 2018)

Key Insight: Non-party status is significant factor in proportionality analysis, must demonstrate ‘significant expense’ before receiving protection

Nature of Case: Racketeering, Consumer Protection

Electronic Data Involved: Deposition

Keywords: Deposition, transfer, removal, proportionality

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.