Key Insight: Where defendant did not timely object to document requests and belated privilege log was inadequate, court determined that attorney-client privilege and work product protection had been waived and ordered production
Nature of Case: Insurance coverage
Electronic Data Involved: Insurer’s computerized “Z-note” file contents related to particular claim
Key Insight: Plaintiffs’ motion for on-site inspection of computer records granted and defendant ordered to pay all plaintiffs’ expenses and legal fees unnecessarily expended due to defendant’s failure to make an accurate disclosure of its computer capabilities in December 1998
Nature of Case: Trademark infringement
Electronic Data Involved: Computerized information re purchase of goods bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks
Key Insight: No abuse of discretion to dismiss suit with prejudice and impose sanctions against plaintiff under Rule 11, where it was determined that plaintiff had relied on falsified email and letters to support her discrimination claims
Nature of Case: Employment discrimination based on race, sex and ethnic origin
Electronic Data Involved: Email
Key Insight: Trial court erred in not dismissing defendants’ counterclaim and third party complaint as sanction for spoliation of evidence — contrary to court’s orders, defendants purged databases and produced backup tapes that were compromised and unusable
Nature of Case: Plaintiff sought declaratory judgment that it was not in default of license agreement
Electronic Data Involved: Computer databases and backup tapes
Key Insight: Court ordered cost-shifting (50/50) where plaintiff sought information about Verizon’s past and present customers even though material was not “inaccessible” under Zubulake analysis, since data was available in Verizon’s computer databases or archives
Nature of Case: Breach of contract and related claims
Electronic Data Involved: Computerized customer data
Key Insight: Court ruled, reluctantly, that even though defendant had violated protective order relating to use of subject software and database, the order was not sufficiently clear and definite to be enforced by contempt
Nature of Case: Copyright infringement
Electronic Data Involved: Software and database
Key Insight: Court modified prior order directing defendants to produce contents of hard drives for in camera inspection; individual defendants now directed to produce hard copies of all emails relating to allegations against certain individual, including any deleted emails recovered by a qualified expert appointed by the referee supervising the discovery; only those emails that in fact deal with relevant allegations to be turned over to the plaintiff; plaintiff agreed to bear all costs related to recovery of data from hard drive
Nature of Case: Sex discrimination, negligent supervision and breach of contract
Electronic Data Involved: Email and deleted email on hard drives of individual defendants
Key Insight: City employees? personal email not subject to disclosure under public records law because it fell outside the state’s statutory definition of public records; mere placement of such email on government-owned computer system does not transform such email into a “public record”
Nature of Case: Suit by newspaper to access city employees’ emails under public records law; issue was certified to Florida Supreme Court as “question of great public importance”
Electronic Data Involved: Personal email stored on government-owned computers
Key Insight: Plaintiffs allowed to serve appropriately-worded subpoenas on certain third parties for limited purpose of giving notice of action and placing them under duty to preserve relevant evidence
Nature of Case: Securities fraud
Electronic Data Involved: Unspecified electronic data of third parties
Key Insight: Mandamus relief granted; “run” from database to be narrowed to retrieve only falling-merchandise incidents within geographic and temporal limits set forth by trial court
Nature of Case: Negligence, premises liability
Electronic Data Involved: Run from computer database
Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.