Key Insight: Court denied request for sanctions or adverse inference instruction based on absence of video footage of plaintiff after arrest since there was no evidence of bad faith and video security system had experienced a number of unexplained problems
Nature of Case: Plaintiff alleged use of excessive force
Electronic Data Involved: Video surveillance footage
Key Insight: Court denied as overly broad plaintiff’s request that government identify and produce all investigations and electronic databases concerning contamination at World War II Army Air Force bases, and instead ordered government to, at plaintiff’s indicated preference, either provide an index to the electronic databases or provide a knowledgeable member of its staff to assist plaintiff in its review of the databases
Nature of Case: CERCLA litigation
Electronic Data Involved: Databases
Key Insight: Computer generated diary of investigation of incident by defendant’s adjusting company constituted work product and was protected from discovery
Nature of Case: Personal injury
Electronic Data Involved: Computer generated diary
Key Insight: Court granted plaintiff’s request for Rule 56(f) continuance and dismissed defendant’s motion for summary judgment as premature and with leave to refile once defendant had fulfilled all its discovery obligations, where plaintiff had already filed a number of discovery motions and sought, among other things, “information contained in emails which appear to have been deleted by Honda as part of its corporate policy (and which are the subject of a separate Motion for Order Preserving Electronic Data, to Recover[] Deleted Data and Show Cause which is pending before the magistrate)”
Nature of Case: Trademark infringement
Electronic Data Involved: Deleted email
Key Insight: Magistrate denied defendant’s motion for contempt order under Rule 45(e) for non-party’s alleged failure to comply with subpoena and court order, where non-party had produced roughly 3,500 pages of responsive documents, and reason for non-production of four particular emails (given to defendant by ex-employee of non-party) was because non-party did not have possession of and could not produce them since the computer and server that once contained them were no longer available to non-party
Nature of Case: Sex discrimination/harassment
Electronic Data Involved: Email
Key Insight: Sixth circuit affirmed dismissal of complaint as a discovery sanction under FRCP 37(b)(2)(C) and the award of all attorney fees to defendants under 42 U.S.C. ? 1988, where plaintiffs “repeatedly touted and promised to produce critical ‘smoking gun’ evidence, then failed or refused to produce it; belatedly produced an incomplete collection of evidence; falsely stated that they had produced all the evidence ordered; deliberately withheld evidence; strained credulity by claiming that they gave away original tapes of critical conversations, keeping none for themselves, and made no effort to get copies; asserted a nonsensical privilege as a reason for failing to produce more or better evidence of defendants’ allegedly defamatory statements; agreed to seek permission from the state court to produce financial and accounting documents, but never did so; and so on”
Nature of Case: Civil rights
Electronic Data Involved: Audio and videotapes supporting plaintiffs’ claims
Key Insight: Court denied motion to compel plaintiff to produce a witness for further deposition under FRCP 30(b)(6), stating that, although defendant “may have some basis for complaining about the timing and manner in which the spreadsheet was produced,” defendant did not demonstrate that additional testimony was necessary regarding the spreadsheet, or that there was any information that was more readily obtainable from a live witness than from the spreadsheet which had been produced in native format
Nature of Case: Trademark infringement
Electronic Data Involved: Excel spreadsheet
Key Insight: Where plaintiff sought a fuller production of email communications from the servers of a wide variety of DB personnel, and DB represented that it searched all pertinent email files and had no other responsive emails, court ruled: “Under these circumstances, the only avenue open to [plaintiff] on this matter is to pursue the question of the scope of e-mail use and retention through depositions.”
Nature of Case: Trademark infringement
Electronic Data Involved: Email
Key Insight: Given the tremendous volume of information accumulated in claims database and defendant’s claimed inability to segregate claims based on various attributes, court ordered parties to develop sampling protocol to obtain examples of claims files that involved issue similar to that in the litigation
Nature of Case: Reinsurance dispute
Electronic Data Involved: Claims database
Key Insight: Magistrate judge was within his discretion to order that original discs be produced for computer expert’s inspection and copying so that all parties could be satisfied as to the authenticity and integrity of the copies provided
Nature of Case: Employment discrimination
Electronic Data Involved: Computer discs onto which plaintiff had copied various files of defendant
Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.