Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Fish v. Kobach (D. Kan. , 2018)
2
Metlife Investors USA Insurance Company v. Lindsey et al., No. 2:16-cv-00097-RL-JEM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 25, 2018)
3
Henson v. Turn (Northern District of California, 2018)
4
d?Amico Dry v. Nikka Finance, Inc. (S.D. Ala., 2018)
5
Beseke v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, No. 17-CV-4971-DWF-KMM (D. Minn, 2018)
6
Updateme Inc. v. Axel Springer SE, No. 17-cv-05054-SI (LB) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2018)
7
Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Moody, 154 Ohio St.3d 253, 2018-Ohio-4071 (Ohio St.3d, 2018)
8
Ronnie Van Zant, Inc. v. Cleopatra Records, Inc. (2nd Circuit, 2018)
9
Adidas America, Inc. v. TRB Acquisitions LLC (District of Oregon, 2018)
10
Corel Software v. Microsoft (District of Utah, 2018)

Henson v. Turn (Northern District of California, 2018)

Key Insight: Direct inspection of mobile devices for specific information (browsing history/cookies) or the full web browsing history/cookies is not proportional to matters regarding a single company’s websites

Nature of Case: Data privacy

Electronic Data Involved: Cookies, internet history

Keywords: zombie cookie, Verizon, respawn, orwellian irony

View Case Opinion

d?Amico Dry v. Nikka Finance, Inc. (S.D. Ala., 2018)

Key Insight: With prior notive, any party can specify another method of recording testimony than was in the original notice

Nature of Case: Admiralty action

Electronic Data Involved: Videotaped deposition

Keywords: Protective orders, EU,

View Case Opinion

Beseke v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, No. 17-CV-4971-DWF-KMM (D. Minn, 2018)

Key Insight: accessibility of data

Nature of Case: Violations of the FCRA

Electronic Data Involved: information related to similar lawsuits and consumer complaints

Keywords: data, searchable, accessible, access*, undue burden,

View Case Opinion

Updateme Inc. v. Axel Springer SE, No. 17-cv-05054-SI (LB) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2018)

Key Insight: proportionality, undue burden, ESI protocol terms, privilege

Nature of Case: trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: electronic records

Keywords: random sample, random sampling, responsiveness, responsive documents

View Case Opinion

Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Moody, 154 Ohio St.3d 253, 2018-Ohio-4071 (Ohio St.3d, 2018)

Key Insight: Attorney sanctions for dishonest conduct and willful interference with discovery process

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination

Keywords: attorney misconduct, dishonest conduct, false testimony

View Case Opinion

Ronnie Van Zant, Inc. v. Cleopatra Records, Inc. (2nd Circuit, 2018)

Key Insight: consent order provisions are inconsistent to support an injunction

Nature of Case: violation of a consent order from a settlement.

Electronic Data Involved: consent order from 1988 and script of the movie under injunction

Keywords: consent order, inconsistent, insufficiently precise

View Case Opinion

Adidas America, Inc. v. TRB Acquisitions LLC (District of Oregon, 2018)

Key Insight: Non-ideal conduct related to discovery does not automatically rise to “willfully deceiv[ing]” the court for dismissal sanctions, failure to produce discovery in a timely manner leads to cost shifting

Nature of Case: Trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents generally

Keywords: “routine document destruction,” sticker,

View Case Opinion

Corel Software v. Microsoft (District of Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: Available resources plays into undue burden decision making and when part of the data has already been produced, relevance has already been conceded

Nature of Case: Infringement

Electronic Data Involved: Telemetry data

Keywords: Telemetry data, GPDR

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.