Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Fishman v. Tiger Natural Gas (Northern District of California, 2018)
2
Folino v. Hines (District Court of Western District of Pennsylvania, 2018)
3
Worldpay, US, Inc. v. Haydon (No. 17-cv-4179 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 14, 2018), 2018)
4
Clark v. FDS Bank et al (District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando Division, 2018)
5
Swift Beef Co. v. Alex Lee, Inc., No. 18-0105-EFM-KGG (D. Kan. Oct. 31, 2018)
6
Dunne v. Resource Converting, LLC et al., No. 4:16-cv-01351-DDN (E.D. Mo. Oct. 30, 2018)
7
United States v. Kemp (E.D. Mich., 2018)
8
Entrata v. Yardi Systems (D. Utah, 2018)
9
Fuhs v. McLachlan Drilling Co. (W.D. Pa., 2018)
10
HM Compounding Servs., LLC v. Express Scripts, Inc., No. 4:14-CV-01858 JAR (E.D. Mo. Oct. 26, 2018)

Fishman v. Tiger Natural Gas (Northern District of California, 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant’s unsupervised and under inclusive ESI searches remedied by additional searches and disclosure of previous search paramaters

Nature of Case: Fraudulent telemarketing

Electronic Data Involved: Audio recordings

Keywords: Telemarketing, Fishman, mortal mistake

View Case Opinion

Worldpay, US, Inc. v. Haydon (No. 17-cv-4179 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 14, 2018), 2018)

Key Insight: whether failure to maintain e-mail website domain and preserve e-mails it contained demonstrated “intent to deprive” under Rule 37(e)

Nature of Case: trade secret

Electronic Data Involved: e-mail, e-mail website domain

Keywords: superfluous

View Case Opinion

Clark v. FDS Bank et al (District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando Division, 2018)

Key Insight: whether the plaintiff is required to identify the specific fields of information for Rule 26(f) conference

Nature of Case: Violation of TCPA

Electronic Data Involved: telephone calls from autodialing system

Keywords: autodialing system

View Case Opinion

Swift Beef Co. v. Alex Lee, Inc., No. 18-0105-EFM-KGG (D. Kan. Oct. 31, 2018)

Key Insight: relevance, proportionality, undue burden, relative access

Nature of Case: contract dispute

Electronic Data Involved: sweeping document request

Keywords: motion to quash, defunct entity, third party subpoena

View Case Opinion

Dunne v. Resource Converting, LLC et al., No. 4:16-cv-01351-DDN (E.D. Mo. Oct. 30, 2018)

Key Insight: Producing illegible, blurry, or documents in an obscure file format may require reproduction of legible versions of the documents and the costs of the motion to compel that production are on the at-fault party

Nature of Case: Contract dispute

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents

Keywords: Quality, blurry, black and white, color, mbox

View Case Opinion

Entrata v. Yardi Systems (D. Utah, 2018)

Key Insight: objection that requests are not relevant because requesting party’s defense is meritless is sanctionable

Nature of Case: interception of communication, defamation

Electronic Data Involved: email, text messages, calendars

Keywords: improper objection sanctioned

View Case Opinion

Fuhs v. McLachlan Drilling Co. (W.D. Pa., 2018)

Key Insight: spoliation

Nature of Case: Fair Labor Standards Act, retaliation

Electronic Data Involved: mobile phone data, text messages

Keywords: spoliation, sanctions, preservation, reasonable steps, intent to deprive, negligence

View Case Opinion

HM Compounding Servs., LLC v. Express Scripts, Inc., No. 4:14-CV-01858 JAR (E.D. Mo. Oct. 26, 2018)

Key Insight: Plaintiff produced cast majority of document after discovery cutoff. Court ruled that this warranted sanctions and excluded them from using those document, jury instruction , excluded their expert testimony and awarded attorneys fees to defendant.

Nature of Case: Breach of Contract

Electronic Data Involved: Cash Transaction Records

Keywords: Sanctions, production after deadline, expert opinions

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.