Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Adelphia Supply USA, et al. (E.D.N.Y., 2019)
2
Dembski v. Clear Rate Communications, Inc. 18-cv-12622 (E.D. Michigan, 2019)
3
Adacel, Inc. et al v. Adsync Technologies, Inc. (M.D. Fla., 2019)
4
Kratz v. Scott Hotel Group, LLC (S.D. Ind., 2019)
5
Torres-Torres v. KW International, Inc., No-18-cv-164 (M.D. Fla., 2019)
6
Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. v. Remark (Florida, 2019)
7
In Shir Law Group, P.A. v. Carnevale (Florida, 2019)
8
Neely v. The Boeing Company (Western Disctrict of Washington, 2019)
9
4DD Holdings, LLC. v. USA (US Court of Federal Claims, 2019)
10
Dahmer v. Western Kentucky Univ. (Western Kentucky, 2019)

Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Adelphia Supply USA, et al. (E.D.N.Y., 2019)

Key Insight: whether terminating sanctions are appropriate where party engaged in discovery misconduct, including intentionally limiting search terms to exclude documents

Nature of Case: Trademark, Unfair Competition

Electronic Data Involved: documents

Keywords: sanctions, terminate, discovery misconduct, removed document, fraud on the court

View Case Opinion

Dembski v. Clear Rate Communications, Inc. 18-cv-12622 (E.D. Michigan, 2019)

Key Insight: whether discovery should be stayed until after dispositive motions

Nature of Case: violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Electronic Data Involved: stay of discovery

Keywords: “safe harbor” defense, stay of discovery, dispositive motions

View Case Opinion

Adacel, Inc. et al v. Adsync Technologies, Inc. (M.D. Fla., 2019)

Key Insight: general objections overruled and defendant ordered to produce records relating to profits, but does not have to disclose all documents relating to “methods of calculating” profits beyond what is necessary to understand

Nature of Case: Misappropriation of trade secrets

Electronic Data Involved: business records re profits

Keywords: general objection,

View Case Opinion

Kratz v. Scott Hotel Group, LLC (S.D. Ind., 2019)

Key Insight: whether original version of narrative detailing mistreatments sent to attorney was work product; whether work product privilege attached to subsequent revisions of the same

Nature of Case: Consumer Class Action

Electronic Data Involved: withheld original document

Keywords: work product, original, altered

View Case Opinion

Torres-Torres v. KW International, Inc., No-18-cv-164 (M.D. Fla., 2019)

Key Insight: Work product protections do not attach to data automatically generated by a vehicles electronic control module.

Nature of Case: vehicle collision personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: vehicle Electronic Control Module data

Keywords: Electronic Control Module

View Case Opinion

Shamrock-Shamrock, Inc. v. Remark (Florida, 2019)

Key Insight: Non party third parties do not have a duty to preserve in anticipation of litigation.

Nature of Case: Spoliation (property rezoning)

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic documents

Keywords: Preservation, spoliation, third-party, Shamrock

Identified State Rule(s): 440.39(7)

View Case Opinion

In Shir Law Group, P.A. v. Carnevale (Florida, 2019)

Key Insight: Search terms must be narrow, “condo” is too broad a term when seeking discovery from a law firm specializing in condominium law

Nature of Case: Attorney malpractice

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data

Keywords: Malpractice, condominium, dissolution, condo

View Case Opinion

Neely v. The Boeing Company (Western Disctrict of Washington, 2019)

Key Insight: Bifurcation of a pst file does not constitute destruction/spoliation

Nature of Case: Employment age discrimation

Electronic Data Involved: .pst file

Keywords: pst file, “whole, untouched, pristine condition”

View Case Opinion

4DD Holdings, LLC. v. USA (US Court of Federal Claims, 2019)

Key Insight: whether the government intentionally acted in a way that destroyed evidence

Nature of Case: copyright infringement

Electronic Data Involved: TETRA healthcare data federation software, hard drives, digital information

Keywords: spoliation, reasonable steps to preserve, decommissioning

View Case Opinion

Dahmer v. Western Kentucky Univ. (Western Kentucky, 2019)

Key Insight: Student witness statements or employee records are not FERPA protected “educational records,” FERPA can also be overcome through proper redactions and a demonstrable need for the information, no personal stakes in the outcome in the suit discourages disclosure of third party employment records

Nature of Case: Sex-based discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Various electronic records

Keywords: FERPA, Western Kentucky University, Title IX

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.