Catagory:Case Summaries

1
Herzig et al. v. Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc. (District Court of Western Arkansas, 2019)
2
IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (N.D. Fla., 2019)
3
Washington v. Geo Group, Inc. (District Court of Western Washington, 2019)
4
Pineda Transportation, LLC et al v. Fleetone Factoring, LLC et al (District Court of Middle District of Tennessee, 2019)
5
In Re: MacBook Keyboard Litigation (N.D. Cal. , 2019)
6
Bass v. Facebook, Inc., No. 18-cv-05982 (N.D. Cal., 2019)
7
Brumer v. Gray, No. 17-cv-00576 (D. Nev., 2019)
8
In re Old BPSUSH Inc., No. 16-12373 (Bnkr. D. Del., 2019)
9
Song et al v. Drenberg et al (N.D. Cal. , 2019)
10
BARKER v. KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM USA, INC. et al (S.D. Ind., 2019)

Herzig et al. v. Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc. (District Court of Western Arkansas, 2019)

Key Insight: Responsive communications were intentionally withheld and destroyed when the plaintiffs switched to an encrypted communication app

Nature of Case: wrongful termination and age discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: emails, text messages.

Keywords: Intentional spoliation, bad faith, encrypted communication application

View Case Opinion

Pineda Transportation, LLC et al v. Fleetone Factoring, LLC et al (District Court of Middle District of Tennessee, 2019)

Key Insight: whether the delays in a case as a result of attorney error or inattention could be a reason to dismiss a case

Nature of Case: breach of contract, fraud

Electronic Data Involved: emails, documents

Keywords: evasive, face value

View Case Opinion

In Re: MacBook Keyboard Litigation (N.D. Cal. , 2019)

Key Insight: Court did not grant motion to allow only TAR review but ordered cost estimate for cost shifting if requesting party proceeds with insisting review of 100k documents with 1-2% relevance rate

Keywords: low responsive rate and TAR

View Case Opinion

Bass v. Facebook, Inc., No. 18-cv-05982 (N.D. Cal., 2019)

Key Insight: A contract clause limiting liability for data breaches caused by third parties is not unconscionable. However, this clause does not bar negligence claims for failing to comply with minimum data-security standards.

Nature of Case: data-breach class action

Electronic Data Involved: customer personal data

Keywords: data security, personal data, breach, unconscionable

View Case Opinion

Brumer v. Gray, No. 17-cv-00576 (D. Nev., 2019)

Key Insight: Waiting until the last day of discovery to provide computation of damages does not constitute bad faith warranting severe sanctions.

Nature of Case: vehicle collision negligence

Keywords: willfulness, bad faith, last day of discovery

View Case Opinion

In re Old BPSUSH Inc., No. 16-12373 (Bnkr. D. Del., 2019)

Key Insight: A law firm’s investigative records prepared for a client may not be withheld on work-product grounds from that client or former client.

Nature of Case: bankruptcy

Electronic Data Involved: Law firm investigative records and forensic accounts

Keywords: work-product, mental impressions, investigative records

View Case Opinion

BARKER v. KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM USA, INC. et al (S.D. Ind., 2019)

Key Insight: Responding party did not meet its burden to show requests were improper because it only responded with general objections

Nature of Case: breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: emails and business records

Keywords: general objection,

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.