Author - KLG PDF Import

1
Vir2us, Inc. v. Invincea, Inc. (E.D. Va., 2017)
2
Wali Muhammad v. Mathena, No. 7:14CV00529, 2017 WL 3955225 (W.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2017)
3
Hibbett Patient Care, LLC v. Pharmacists Mut. Ins. Co., No. CA 16-00231-WS-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2017).
4
Martinz v. Salazar (District of New Mexico, 2017)
5
Morrison v. Veale, M.D., No. 3:14-cv-1020-TFM, 2017 WL 372980 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2017)
6
ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan v. Connecticut General, 3:15-cv-02965-WHA (N.D. Cal., 2017)
7
Rife v. Okla. Dept. of Public Safety (10th Circuit Court of Appeals, 2017)
8
Jenkins v. Woody, 2017 WL 362475, 3:15cv355 (E.D. Va, 2017)
9
Rockman Company v. Nong Shim Company (Northern District California, 2017)
10
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cuker Interactive, LLC (W.D. Ark., 2017)

Vir2us, Inc. v. Invincea, Inc. (E.D. Va., 2017)

Key Insight: inadequate search and production, misrepresentation, failure to supplement, follow-up, failure to disclose

Nature of Case: patent infringement

Electronic Data Involved: email, board meeting minutes, investor presentations

Keywords: monetary sanctions, needless burden, late disclosures, post-settlement order, misrepresentation, motion to show cause

View Case Opinion

Hibbett Patient Care, LLC v. Pharmacists Mut. Ins. Co., No. CA 16-00231-WS-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 26, 2017).

Key Insight: Plaintiff requested information related to outside counsel’s evaluation of claims. Court granted, but limited original request.

Nature of Case: Insurance breach of contract and bad faith

Electronic Data Involved: Various documents related to claims investigations; primarily related to outside counsel evaluations.

Keywords: scope; outside counsel; evaluation of claim

View Case Opinion

Martinz v. Salazar (District of New Mexico, 2017)

Key Insight: Even with a litigation hold, if a party would have made no efforts to obtain a serial number, bad faith is not found. Sloppy paperwork may be considered gross negligence in a totality of the circumstances. Rule 37(e) was not used.

Nature of Case: Excessive police force

Electronic Data Involved: Electronic data (Taser usage records)

Keywords: taser, cartridge, serial number, spoliation

Morrison v. Veale, M.D., No. 3:14-cv-1020-TFM, 2017 WL 372980 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2017)

Key Insight: Spoliation of evidence via a mobile device. Case filed prior to new Rule 37(e) enactment, so, rule does not apply.

Nature of Case: Fair Labor Standards Act violation

Electronic Data Involved: e-mail account records

Keywords: “old” bad faith analysis, misdirection and deception, 2-step verification.

View Case Opinion

ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan v. Connecticut General, 3:15-cv-02965-WHA (N.D. Cal., 2017)

Key Insight: Service provider failed to preserve ESI

Nature of Case: ERISA action

Electronic Data Involved: ESI contained on servers

Keywords: failure to preserve, servers, service provider, inherent power authority

View Case Opinion

Rife v. Okla. Dept. of Public Safety (10th Circuit Court of Appeals, 2017)

Key Insight: Without using FRCP 37(e), bad faith is still an importance factor for spoliation

Nature of Case: Failure to provide medical care (deliberate indifference)

Electronic Data Involved: Video footage

Keywords: deliberate indifference, spoliation sanctions

View Case Opinion

Jenkins v. Woody, 2017 WL 362475, 3:15cv355 (E.D. Va, 2017)

Key Insight: defendants took no steps to save a copy of the footage, and it was overwritten after 30 days elapsed.

Nature of Case: Death by negligence and deliberate indifference

Electronic Data Involved: surveillance camera footage

Keywords: surveillance camera footage, defendant sheriff, anticipation of litigation

View Case Opinion

Rockman Company v. Nong Shim Company (Northern District California, 2017)

Key Insight: Duty of preservation is not enforceable for foreign company investigated by foreign government with no lawsuits filed in USA

Nature of Case: antitrust

Electronic Data Involved: deleted electronic records

Keywords: duty of preservation foreign, foreign government investigation preserve

View Case Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Cuker Interactive, LLC (W.D. Ark., 2017)

Key Insight: failure to review backup tapes, attorney’s fees

Nature of Case: contract dispute

Electronic Data Involved: email, backup tapes

Keywords: destruction of laptop, key employee, prejudice, duty to preserve, adverse inference, retention policy

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.