Archive - 2019

1
Gates Corp. v. CRP Industries, No. 16-cv-01145 (D. Colo., 2019)
2
Doe 1 et al v. City of Chicago (N.D. Ill., 2019)
3
Miller v. Thompson-Walk (District Court of Western Pennsylvania, 2019)
4
Jacops v. Foreportal Inc. (District Court of Nebraska, 2019)
5
Washington-St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Louisiana Generating, LLC (M.D. Louisiana, 2019)
6
McLean et al v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (D. Minn. , 2019)
7
Universal Standard Inc., v. Target Corporation, et al. (S.D. New York, 2019)
8
Kizer et al v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Co et al (W.D. Okla., 2019)
9
Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Adelphia Supply USA, et al. (E.D.N.Y., 2019)
10
Dembski v. Clear Rate Communications, Inc. 18-cv-12622 (E.D. Michigan, 2019)

Gates Corp. v. CRP Industries, No. 16-cv-01145 (D. Colo., 2019)

Key Insight: The crime-fraud exception invalidates attorney client privilege protections with regards to an internal investigation of an employee now known to have stolen proprietary documents and shared them with her supervisor.

Nature of Case: Theft of confidential business documents

Electronic Data Involved: database containing proprietary information

Keywords: proprietary information, theft, crime-fraud exception

View Case Opinion

Washington-St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Louisiana Generating, LLC (M.D. Louisiana, 2019)

Key Insight: emails included third parties and were not proven to be attorney client privilege and have been improperly withheld

Nature of Case: Breach of contract

Electronic Data Involved: emails improperly withheld as Attorney-client privilege.

Keywords: Attorney-client privilege, improperly withheld, emails copied to third parties.

View Case Opinion

Universal Standard Inc., v. Target Corporation, et al. (S.D. New York, 2019)

Key Insight: privilege was waived because a public relations firm took part in the email exchanges adn they were not identified on the privilege log

Nature of Case: Trademark infringement

Electronic Data Involved: emails that were claimed to be privileged

Keywords: waived privilege, attorney-client privilege, work product, third party communication waiving privilege.

View Case Opinion

Kizer et al v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Co et al (W.D. Okla., 2019)

Key Insight: relevant to see if distracted driving but three days worth disproportionate

Nature of Case: personal injury

Electronic Data Involved: cell phone records

Keywords: truck driver’s cell phone activity to see if distracted

View Case Opinion

Abbott Laboratories, et al. v. Adelphia Supply USA, et al. (E.D.N.Y., 2019)

Key Insight: whether terminating sanctions are appropriate where party engaged in discovery misconduct, including intentionally limiting search terms to exclude documents

Nature of Case: Trademark, Unfair Competition

Electronic Data Involved: documents

Keywords: sanctions, terminate, discovery misconduct, removed document, fraud on the court

View Case Opinion

Dembski v. Clear Rate Communications, Inc. 18-cv-12622 (E.D. Michigan, 2019)

Key Insight: whether discovery should be stayed until after dispositive motions

Nature of Case: violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Electronic Data Involved: stay of discovery

Keywords: “safe harbor” defense, stay of discovery, dispositive motions

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.