Archive - 2018

1
Schmalz v. Village of North Riverside, et al, No. 13-cv-8012 (N.D. Ill. March 23, 2018)
2
Dremak v. Urban Outfitter (Cal. App., 2018)
3
Shire LLC v. Abhai, LLC, No. 15-13909-WGY (D. Mass. Mar. 22, 2018)
4
Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00256-MRH (W.D. Pa. March 21, 2018)
5
EEOC v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., No. 15-cv-256 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2018)
6
Cruz Vargas Alicea v. Continental Casualty Co., No. Civ. 15-1941 (D.P.R. Mar. 21, 2018)
7
Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center (9th Circuit, 2018)
8
Ramos v. Hopele of Fort Lauderdale, LLC., No. 0:17-cv-62100-FAM (S.D. Fla. March 19, 2018)
9
Travelers Property Casulaty Company of America v. Mountaineer Gas Company, et al., No. 2:15-cv-07959 (S.D. W. Va. March 16, 2018)
10
In re Abilify (Aripiprazole) Product Liability Litigation, No. 3:16-md-2734 (N.D. Fla. , 2018)

Schmalz v. Village of North Riverside, et al, No. 13-cv-8012 (N.D. Ill. March 23, 2018)

Key Insight: Spoliation of text messages, negligent spoliation, analysis under FRCP 37(e)

Nature of Case: Employment, wrongful termination, retaliation

Electronic Data Involved: Text messages

Keywords: Litigation hold, spoliation, text messages, 37(e), jury instruction,

View Case Opinion

Dremak v. Urban Outfitter (Cal. App., 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant incurred costs that were “reasonable and necessary to the litigation” via a “time consuming process”, and thus were awarded the costs from the opposing party.

Nature of Case: Violation of the Credit Card Act, class action

Electronic Data Involved: Wide range of documents

Keywords: Predictive coding, seed set, “reasonable and necessary”, Predictive coding cost

Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00256-MRH (W.D. Pa. March 21, 2018)

Key Insight: Inconvenient is not unreasonable or burdensome wrt e-discovery

Nature of Case: Employment discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Emails

Keywords: smoking gun,

View Case Opinion

EEOC v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., No. 15-cv-256 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant claimed reviewing 363,000 emails would be unduly burdensome. Court rules that even the expected responsiveness rate of between 8.3% and 15% meant it would be valuable. Court required defendant to review the emails and denied cost shifting requested by defendant.

Nature of Case: Employment Discrimination

Electronic Data Involved: Email

Keywords: burdensome, responsiveness, proportionality

View Case Opinion

Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center (9th Circuit, 2018)

Key Insight: Sanctions because party violated court order to produce expert witness for deposition and didn’t notice until afterwards

Nature of Case: employee class action

Electronic Data Involved: expert witness deposition

Keywords: expert deposition, timing, subpoena , sanctions, expert witness, expert fees, court order violation

View Case Opinion

Ramos v. Hopele of Fort Lauderdale, LLC., No. 0:17-cv-62100-FAM (S.D. Fla. March 19, 2018)

Key Insight: Forensic examination must be proportional to the information it can exclusively gain, including privacy concerns

Nature of Case: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (Class Action)

Electronic Data Involved: Text messages

Keywords: Text messages, imaging, forensic, proportionality

View Case Opinion

Travelers Property Casulaty Company of America v. Mountaineer Gas Company, et al., No. 2:15-cv-07959 (S.D. W. Va. March 16, 2018)

Key Insight: Filings for spoliation sanctions should be timely, years after alleged destruction suggests untimely

Nature of Case: Insurance subrogation

Electronic Data Involved: Testing data from safety devices

Keywords: Spoliation, sanctions, boiler

View Case Opinion

Copyright © 2022, K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved.