Dremak v. Urban Outfitter (Cal. App., 2018)

Key Insight: Defendant incurred costs that were “reasonable and necessary to the litigation” via a “time consuming process”, and thus were awarded the costs from the opposing party.

Nature of Case: Violation of the Credit Card Act, class action

Electronic Data Involved: Wide range of documents

Keywords: Predictive coding, seed set, “reasonable and necessary”, Predictive coding cost