Holick v. Burkhart ( No. 16-1188-JTM (D. Kan. Nov. 30, 2017), 2017)
Key Insight: Plaintiff did not specify whether any documents were being withheld in the course of making objections to discovery motions
Nature of Case: libel, assault, slander
Electronic Data Involved: documents and communications posted or stored on social media, e-mails
Keywords: “facially overbroad”, “anti-abortion”, “nearly two-decade time frame”, “provide any responsive information for the past seven (7) years”